Originally posted by Styrbiorn
Actually Markland is the Labrador coast (Markland meaning forest land). However the Belle Isle may have been included in that name.
I know
Originally posted by Styrbiorn
Actually Markland is the Labrador coast (Markland meaning forest land). However the Belle Isle may have been included in that name.
Originally posted by Mad King James
I knowOf course I'm assuming the Vinlanders aren't too picky about crossing into Quebec, and I assume they consider everything north of Vinland and south of Helluland is 'Markland'
![]()
Originally posted by Mad King James
This raises a good point, once they figure out Vinland is an island, what are they going to call the other 'new lands' they discover?
Let's see, we've got 'Worm Land' 'Wine Land' and 'Lucky Land' what should Isle Royale be how about 'Fjordøy' ('bay island' once they find out it's in the middle of what they think is a bay)? I propose Flodland for Quebec ('river land') south of there is 'Skraelingland'![]()
Originally posted by Languish
According to our timeline over 400 years it is highly probably that they figured vinland was an island some time ago![]()
Originally posted by Mad King James
Catholicism was extremely important to the early viking settlers in Greenland and Vinland, and they took great pains to maintain links with the church, I think if Vinland exists in 1419 they should know about Europe, and most 'Viking' nations should know about them (Sweden, Denmark and Norway).
Presumably if the Greenlanders all moved to Vinland, Greenland would soon enough be recolonized by the Greenlanders as a pit-stop between Europe and Vinland.
Also, if the Vinlanders colonized anything other than Vinland it would be Markland (Belle Isle).
Originally posted by Mad King James
Let's see, we've got 'Worm Land' 'Wine Land' and 'Lucky Land'
Originally posted by Styrbiorn
Worm land? You confuse me now
We got Vinland (Grass/Meadow land), Markland (Forest land) and Helluland (Stone land)
And that would be Skrælingaland and Fjörðey (that -öy part is a modern Norwegian invention).
Originally posted by Mad King James
Ok you guys have to remember something... Even though 'Vinland' was colonized over 400 years before, you're saying basically that the Greenlanders fled to Vinland after the mini-ice age struck. BUT that event happened relatively recently, and most of the people in Vinland then are pretty recent immigrants. In this case, contact with Europe is almost assured, as well as the Vinlanders being mostly Catholic. (the Greenlanders were devout Catholics, and probably the main reason they died was they refused to associate with the Inuit, who likely could have helped them)
This ALSO means though that for most of that 400 years, they would be a smallish colony not overly interested in exploring hostile Skraeling territory.
Originally posted by Languish
The alternative is that contact with Vinland was simply lost, and that the greenlanders never bothered attempting to either settle or contact these vinlanders before finally abandoning their own settlements.
This doesnt discount christian beliefs, but it does avoid a starting catholic colony. If thats what we are really after. Personally i favour a weak norse-christian (pagan) settlement... with the option of re-affirming their christian ties later as they re-establish contact with europe.
Originally posted by Mad King James
You're really dead set on Vinland being Pagan aren't you?![]()
Originally posted by Mad King James
You Norsemen, your languages makes almost as little sense as English
And I thought Vinland was Wine Land?
Originally posted by Languish
Grand chief membertou is the only historical ruler I have discovered (still looking),
There's a few names there, but those appears to not be of Micmacs (I guess they are the "whoopies""they got a south wind and reached Markland, where they found five Skrælings, one of them a grown man with a beard, two women, and two children. Karlsefni captured the boys but the others escaped and sank down into the ground. These boys they kept with them, taught them their language, and they were baptized. They gave their mother's name as Vætilldi, that of their father as Uvægi. They said that kings ruled over Skrælingaland? one of whom was called Avalldamon and the other Valldidida.There were no houses there, they said: the people lodged in caves or holes. A country lay on the other side,they said, opposite their own land, where men walked about in white clothes and whooped loudly, and carried poles and went about with flags"
That makes more sense I guess. This way they will only have abenaki cultured provinces...
I've also re-worked their homelands, based upon extensive research last night and this morning. The lands in Anticosti (123) and Manicouagan (122) have been removed from ownership and instead I have granted them ownership of Isle Royal [cape breton island] (117) instead which is historically accurate. If anything the province of Micmac is historically inaccurate and they are closer to nova scotia and acadie if anything. However the capital can remain in Micmac. Additionally I have given them knowledge of the route to the huron capital of Hochelaga (106) via Megantic (105).
How is this done for the other indian tribes?
It is estimated some 20-30,000 micmacs lived in these lands at this time. How should we spread them out?
I've fixed it (although - it's not DublinOriginally posted by Languish
Looks good harvard although i agree with krunch. Avoid the low countries and dublin just for "saftey" and i reckon we have it cracked.![]()
Of course. These are one of the dangers of making contact with the Europeans... the advantage should be promotion to a better techgroup..
Norway trying to re-subjugate vinland sounds like a neat event, after all surely it would considered by them to be there territory once they gained knowledge of it?
Originally posted by Havard
The saga (of Eirík the red IIRC) tells how they captured a couple of skrælings and learnt about the natives from them: There's a few names there, but those appears to not be of Micmacs (I guess they are the "whoopies" ) That makes more sense I guess. This way they will only have abenaki cultured provinces... How is this done for the other indian tribes?
Originally posted by Havard
I've fixed it (although - it's not Dublin). These are one of the dangers of making contact with the Europeans... the advantage should be promotion to a better techgroup..
Originally posted by Havard
I've fixed it (although - it's not Dublin)
Of course. These are one of the dangers of making contact with the Europeans... the advantage should be promotion to a better techgroup..
I was thinking of what happened to Iceland and Greenland in 1261/2, where they recognized the Norwegian king. Iceland had at this point survived more than 350 years as a mostly independant republic...Originally posted by Mad King James
Re-subjugate? they WERE Norwegians
the only reason they left was they probably pissed someone important off back home in Norway![]()
Originally posted by Mad King James
You're really dead set on Vinland being Pagan aren't you?![]()