Definitely could have gone better. Not entirely sure about Capibara as a candidate. His votes the first two days were lazy, but we'd lynched a wolf, working off information gained from that would seem like the most productive course of action to me. I'm not immediately calling for the lynching of the people who got him lynched, but keeping an eye on them.
The Darman voters though, utterly baffle me. Arkasas made a dangerous vote on him yesterday, so he's an unlikely packmate of Arkasas. In a game of this size there's no guarentee there's a second pack, so it would take a strong case to justify voting Darman. Nothing of the sort was presented. Hax just threw out something vague that De Chat, Darrman and Chieron all voted together for the first two days. Interesting tidbit, sure. Strong case, no. And on this very weak case he got followed by Nepechri, Chieron, and De Chat.
I don't understand why Chieron and De Chat would follow a case which only works by implicating themselves. And they knew that what Hax was suggesting did implicate themselves, they both quoted him on the subject. They both knew that the only case presented on Darman also suggested they were wolves, but they both happily parroted that ti was a good case and ran him up into the lead, puttign him at 3 and votes respectively when everyone else had at most 1 vote. This screams wolves going for a scapegoat.
I definitely want one of Chieron and De Chat lynched today, their actions yesterday make no sense as villagers.
Vote Chieron
