-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
he did only do the icons but i mean that we can use the iconsBasileiosII said:I thought he only made city icons for BYZ, no city images.
Last edited:
TAG--IDs to monarchs--IDs to event--IDs to leadersVenislav2 said:
BYZ--1-100--10001-11000--100001-110000
BUL--101-200--11001-12000--110001-120000
MAG--201-300--12001-13000--120001-130000
VOL--301-400--13001-14000--130001-140000
MEX--401-500--14001-15000--140001-150000
NAF--601-600--15001-16000--150001-160000
cool-toxic said:
Yes. But if we make Orthodoxy seperate from Catholicism we could make Byzantine city images! Then we would have seperate Western (Medieval style, with stone churches, wooden houses), Byzantine (Byzantine churches, houses) and Arab (default) city images!
Sleepyhead said:Yes that sounds like a great idea, the American ones won't be used anyway.
I had the idea of usig the American (OHI) for the European Pagan tribes and Vikings (with a few modifications).
Vikings would be odd though, the Viking Age only lasted from the 9th to the 11th century. An Alternative Muslim/Persian one would be better IMO.BasileiosII said:
Sleepyhead said:
I mean the people who live in Scandinavia. They lived in wooden long houses. And the raids started around 800, so still in game timeframe.
Maybe we could make the Maya city image into a Persian one.
Then you shouldn't have called them VikingsBasileiosII said:
But really, this game is about the Middle east, I think that area deserves most of the cool graphics that's available.
Sleepyhead said:Then you shouldn't have called them Vikings
But really, this game is about the Middle east, I think that area deserves most of the cool graphics that's available.
They already have an Arab image. And then we could add a Persian. I don't see what else they could have.
Any proposals?
I'm not sureBasileiosII said:They already have an Arab image. And then we could add a Persian. I don't see what else they could have.
Any proposals?
Perhaps just an alternative one or something. Giving one to Scandinavia during this timefram is just, wierd IMO.
Sleepyhead said:I'm not sure
Perhaps just an alternative one or something. Giving one to Scandinavia during this timefram is just, wierd IMO.
Not only Scandinavia but anyone that lived in some sort of wodden citadels/villages. It was very common at that time.
Ok, we use MKJs Old World Map if it get's finished. Which map will we use in the meantime? Vanilla or MyMap?
We have used MyMap for the beta so why don't we continue with it ?Basileios I said:
I have a general question ....
Is it possible to modify some regions of MyMap to better fit to our scenario? Southern Italy is the area I'm mostly thinking about. To simulate Roman-Arab activities there correctly it has to be far more detailed in both province shape and province numbers. Other areas are good AFAIK but Southern Italy *definately* needs a modification.
Is it possible that we modify MyMap to achieve that? Are we allowed to do that?
Is it possible to modify some regions of MyMap to better fit to our scenario? Southern Italy is the area I'm mostly thinking about. To simulate Roman-Arab activities there correctly it has to be far more detailed in both province shape and province numbers. Other areas are good AFAIK but Southern Italy *definately* needs a modification.
Is it possible that we modify MyMap to achieve that? Are we allowed to do that?
Yuup you canBasileios I said:
,.or just show me your sketch of that region. and i will send modified of MyMAp when back to Bandung.
agung pasha said:Yuup you can
or just show me your sketch of that region. and i will send modified of MyMAp when back to Bandung.
Cool! Thank you.
Here are my suggestions (you can remove provinces in America if you run out).
The black spot is where the city should be.
Key: (Province Name, City Name, Culture, Religion, Terrain)
1. Calabria, Crotone, Greek, Catholic, Mountain
2. Basilicata, Taranto, Italian, Catholic, Plains
3. Apulia, Baris, Greek, Catholic, Plains
4. Salerno, Salerno, Italian, Catholic, Mountains
5. Catepano, Foggia, Italian, Catholic, Plains
6. Benevento, Benevento, Italian, Catholic, Mountains
7. Napoli, Napoli, Italian, Catholic, Plains
8. Capua, Capua, Italian, Catholic, Plains
9. Lazio, Roma, Italian, Catholic, Plains
10. Spoleto, Spoleto, Italian, Catholic, Mountains
11. Ancona, Ancona, Italian, Catholic, Plains
12. Umbria, Perugia, Italian, Catholic, Mountains
13. Romagna, Ravenna, Italian, Catholic, Plains
14. Sicily, Panormos, Italian, Catholic, Mountains
15. Siracusa, Syrakuse, Greek, Catholic, Plains
16. Messina, Messene, Greek, Catholic, Mountains
The other pictures are just small border corrections in Africa and Arabia (it is strange if you are Arab that you have to conquer Sinai before invading Syria). The Trebizond extension is just to make the later Roman-Arab border nicer. It is not really necessary but would be nice.
Last edited:
America was in different Idgrid region, nothing to do with thatBasileios I said:Cool! Thank you.
Here are my suggestions (you can remove provinces in America if you run out).
<pic>
. Base on that picture there was 5 new provinces that should add in Italy. And Italy IDgrid was full now, so If we want more detail in italy must simplified in other area in the same IDGRID region. So what 5 unimportant provinces in that time frame should remove for that like in balkan, German , Turkish or franche