• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Yes, one shudders to think....

View attachment 1076072
(You must be giving King Þorolfr nightmares of the Norse future.)

King Harald "Bluetooth" of Denmark converted in the 960s, so you are not that far off the original timeline.

Looking forward to the next installment....
Poor Thorolfr, Beornwulf must be what he sees in his nightmares... Maybe he's the Danish bogeyman! :p

I do like how this timeline has similarities, but is diverging in a nice way. Historicity, at least to a small degree, is what I enjoy the most.

Very sensible moves from both East anglia and wessex/England. One has a lot of miltiary strength and guards the entire English border, and the other has increasingly large amounts of political strength, legitimacy and wealth (being in the south where all the good farmland and settlements are).

The peaceful way forward is bonding the two families together, adopting each others children etx till the ruling dynasty of both is the same combined family.

The other two options are one dominates and eradicates the other by force, or they go indepednant again (and then fight each other, naturally).

The use of norse mercenaries for civil wars and dithering on the sidelines is very true to life, so that's good.

And yes, one of the reasons why realms collapse in this period is the heir being far too young or useless, and everyone splitting off into more local and orderly divisons, maybe reuniting again, maybe fighting each other.
It's quite a handy relationship, and beneficial for both parties. The problem with one man owning most of the country is that they could challenge you at any point, given there's no interruptions to that balance.

Judging by how the story's going so far, which outcome do you think is most likely? One united family? Or one who dominates through fire and blood?
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Poor Thorolfr, Beornwulf must be what he sees in his nightmares... Maybe he's the Danish bogeyman! :p

I do like how this timeline has similarities, but is diverging in a nice way. Historicity, at least to a small degree, is what I enjoy the most.


It's quite a handy relationship, and beneficial for both parties. The problem with one man owning most of the country is that they could challenge you at any point, given there's no interruptions to that balance.

Judging by how the story's going so far, which outcome do you think is most likely? One united family? Or one who dominates through fire and blood?

Could go either way. Esepcially with how cheap life was and how easy it is to die. If they intermarriage consistently for a generation or more, they're probably going to end up with one ruling line by default, and then if they're lucky/unlucky, a few 'rival' branches. E.g. York v Lancaster etc.

But it shouldn't be TOO difficult to do, given how close the heartlands of Anglia are to England.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Poor Thorolfr, Beornwulf must be what he sees in his nightmares... Maybe he's the Danish bogeyman! :p
Beornwulf is "The Hammer of the Danes" already, so he's definitely a bogeyman to the Danes.
 
  • 1
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
It looks like bending the knee hasn't reduced East Anglia's influence much, so that's good.

I'm fine with either chapter lengths, honestly.

How many Germanic realms remain overall? In Scandinavia or in England?
 
  • 1
Reactions:
It looks like bending the knee hasn't reduced East Anglia's influence much, so that's good.

I'm fine with either chapter lengths, honestly.

How many Germanic realms remain overall? In Scandinavia or in England?
Throughout both Scandinavia and England, and forgive me, but I'm assuming you mean those following Germanic Paganism (please do correct me if I'm wrong on thar assumption), they're not a dying breed just yet. In Ireland, I do believe it's the religion of their rulers, and the lands of the Duchy of Lancaster in-game are held by the Asatrú faith. In Scandinavia, most of it remains Pagan, apart from those in the far north and Finland, who are slovianskan and Ukonusko respectively. I hope this answers your question!
 
  • 2
Reactions:
For transparency, the next update might take a little longer than usual for me to post, as I've got a tad bit of university work which I need to start on. That won't take too long, then I'll be able to post the next update shortly after the 31st of January (GMT+8). If I make an update before that, I suppose I'm more diligent than I'd like to think ;)

Stay tuned!
 
  • 3
Reactions:
No worries. Your readers will be here when you return.
Good luck in your work. Is this studies? Or teaching? Or both?
Good luck, nevertheless.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
No worries. Your readers will be here when you return.
Good luck in your work. Is this studies? Or teaching? Or both?
Good luck, nevertheless.
Thank you, that's good to hear. :)

To answer your question, I'm studying to become a teacher. And thank you, I'll certainly need it!
 
  • 2
Reactions:
While I love Beornwulf (since I played him, of course!), and though the game does not represent what happens to conquered settlements, just imagine what a sadist zealot does to the countless Norse settlers in England. One dreads to think...
Vikings sowing while burning down a village and massacring everyone - "This is great!"
Vikings reaping when Beornwulf comes over the horizon - "Well this is so unfair."

I admit I struggle to raise much sympathy for the norse settlers and am mostly just cheering Beornwulf on as he reclaims the country. Overall I am impressed with him, he could have got upset at bending the knee and wasted time and lives in a doomed revolt, but instead he's got on with making the best of the situation and setting himself and his heirs into a much stronger position.

I hadn't actually noticed it being particularly long, which I think is a good sign of how well it all flows along, if anything it felt a bit shorter due to the shorter time period covered. There is always a temptation to dive further into detail and I think it is this that is causing you to write more while covering less time. For instance Petre's revolt could have been covered in a single paragraph and still got across the narratively important bits. Now the background as to why Petre revolted is interesting as are the little details about Norse Calais so I'm not suggesting to cut them out, partly because I liked them but mostly because it would be grossly hypocritical as my writing is mostly that sort of background and detail with little actual progress. However I think it is a good example of how you can find yourself writing more but for shorter periods.

Looking at another example, will the son of Burghred or his house feature much later? Trying to get revenge on Beornwulf and his family or whatever? If he doesn't then his reaction to Beornwulf getting the Earldom of Mercia could have been cut, I'm not saying it should be as it was a bit of colour that added depth to the world and I like that sort of thing in modeation. But if you did want to reduce the length for whatever reason then this might be the sort of thing that could be skipped over.
 
  • 2Love
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Vikings sowing while burning down a village and massacring everyone - "This is great!"
Vikings reaping when Beornwulf comes over the horizon - "Well this is so unfair."

I admit I struggle to raise much sympathy for the norse settlers and am mostly just cheering Beornwulf on as he reclaims the country. Overall I am impressed with him, he could have got upset at bending the knee and wasted time and lives in a doomed revolt, but instead he's got on with making the best of the situation and setting himself and his heirs into a much stronger position.

I hadn't actually noticed it being particularly long, which I think is a good sign of how well it all flows along, if anything it felt a bit shorter due to the shorter time period covered. There is always a temptation to dive further into detail and I think it is this that is causing you to write more while covering less time. For instance Petre's revolt could have been covered in a single paragraph and still got across the narratively important bits. Now the background as to why Petre revolted is interesting as are the little details about Norse Calais so I'm not suggesting to cut them out, partly because I liked them but mostly because it would be grossly hypocritical as my writing is mostly that sort of background and detail with little actual progress. However I think it is a good example of how you can find yourself writing more but for shorter periods.

Looking at another example, will the son of Burghred or his house feature much later? Trying to get revenge on Beornwulf and his family or whatever? If he doesn't then his reaction to Beornwulf getting the Earldom of Mercia could have been cut, I'm not saying it should be as it was a bit of colour that added depth to the world and I like that sort of thing in modeation. But if you did want to reduce the length for whatever reason then this might be the sort of thing that could be skipped over.
I certainly do see your point. Maybe Beornwulf is exactly what the Anglo-Saxons need after over a century of Norse raids!

That's very good. I agree that oftentimes, it's very easy to keep diving into what occurred and why, providing more background information, but if it adds more value to the story, then my fears are unfounded. :D

Alfgar and his household will be featured later, as the two houses feud for the control of Beornwulf's new land. However, the outcome is rather easy to foresee, as the two lords' disparity in land and wealth are immense. (A little meta insight) If Hereford hadn't revolted, Alfgar would've remained unlanded, and 'House Mercia' would become extinct as a result. Instead, he had been installed as Ealdorman, and swore fealty to Alfred.
 
Last edited:
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Vikings sowing while burning down a village and massacring everyone - "This is great!"
Vikings reaping when Beornwulf comes over the horizon - "Well this is so unfair."
I certainly do see your point. Maybe Beornwulf is exactly what the Anglo-Saxons need after over a century of Norse raids!
I think we can all agree atrocities on both sides. Such violence is never commendable. However, England does need a defender.
(Yes, I can take off my Danish Viking helm from time to time, just don't let it get back to the characters in my AAR.)

To answer your question, I'm studying to become a teacher. And thank you, I'll certainly need it!
Good luck to you! Teaching is a noble profession and often not appreciated. (But of course, I would say that as someone who earned a living that way for a time and as someone who has teachers in my close family too.)
 
  • 2
Reactions:
I'm roughly a quarter of the way through the next chapter, expect me to post an update on the 3rd of February (GMT+8).

As a fellow Anglo-Saxon authAAR, I definitely need to add this to my reading list.
Excellent! Always glad to have more people on board. I've read a little of your Mead and Blood AAR so far, but I haven't got around to completing it. Akin to your AOW4 AAR, I must commend you on your writing skills!
I think we can all agree atrocities on both sides. Such violence is never commendable. However, England does need a defender.
(Yes, I can take off my Danish Viking helm from time to time, just don't let it get back to the characters in my AAR.)


Good luck to you! Teaching is a noble profession and often not appreciated. (But of course, I would say that as someone who earned a living that way for a time and as someone who has teachers in my close family too.)
Agreed. Beornwulf certainly seemed to be the hero England needed.

Thank you! I do certainly agree.
 
  • 1Love
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
  • 2Love
Reactions:
VII. An English kingdom (924–937)

VII. AN ENGLISH KINGDOM (924–937)


Beornwulf, Lord of the East Angles
1706965798561.png

An intense rivalry had formed between Ælfgar – son of the last Mercian King – and Beornwulf, who had become the most influential man in England both through his acquisition of Mercia and Northumbria, alongside his close personal relationship with the King of the Anglo-Saxons. Their mutual resentment of one another had resulted in the two duelling outside of Hereford on the 28th of September, 924.

Much like his father’s duel with the Norse king Halfdan, Beornwulf had significant advantages – notably in both age and ability. While the East Anglian sub-king lacked much of his left leg, the 46-year-old Beornwulf, according to the mythos surrounding the Ealdorman, showed remarkable prowess for a man deprived of his left knee joint. Ælfgar, too, had significant disabilities. While many sources do not describe in great detail as to what they were, it is said that the grizzled noble was hideous in appearance, but not from birth – as a battle forgotten by time had maimed his ageing body, and had taken both his nose and beauty. Beornwulf had defeated Ælfgar in single combat. While, assumedly, this would absolve any hatred the two shared for each other, this had only fuelled the rage bellowing beneath the two lords, triggering a blood-feud under the claim that the late-Mercian King Burghred had been murdered by Beornwulf’s father, Eadmund.​
Alfgar Demoted 23rd June 926.png
There is little evidence to substantiate Ælfgar’s claim that Eadmund had murdered his father, as the East Anglian King’s acquisition of Bedford – Eadmund’s second and last recorded encounter with Burghred – resulted in minimal violence, and a subsequent banishment from the town. It is unknown where the Mercian monarch was buried, but it is more likely the King died of natural causes than murder. Following Ælfgar’s announcement of a blood-feud, the ageing noble had fallen out of favour with King Eormenred, losing his position and was reduced to the far less prestigious status of Thegn. The reasoning behind Ælfgar’s demotion was likely two-fold; for the King to appease his influential northern friend, and reorganise the chaotic patchwork of autonomous states which Eormenred had inherited in 918. While the implementation of more centralised forms of governance had occurred during the two Ælfred’s reigns between 885 and 918, this was in limited capacity as the West Saxon kings struggled to consolidate their power.

By 924, the Danelaw was crumbling under the weight of Anglo-Saxon reconquest. The Angles of Eastern and Northern England had granted little respite to Sigriðr’s rump-state in Chester, and Beornwulf sought to maintain the pressure. In late-December – with the support of his Hegemon in Bath – the Lord had managed to procure 2,300 men to conquer the Danes’ final stronghold in England. While the Norsemen had fortified much of present-day Lancashire – with significant settlement occurring in the sparsely-populated landscape of the shire – the prize was Chester. Somewhere between 925 and 926, Beornwulf had slaughtered a one-thousand strong Norse host at Stafford, wintering in the town during this time. The Lord besieged Chester in April, failing to overcome the town’s fortifications for four months until he was forced to abandon his siege.

Between September of 926 and the Spring of 932, a series of Norse invasions occurred throughout Central and Northern England. Ælfmær of Leeds – representative of Beornwulf – alongside King Eormenred, had marched north to Bernicia, where the Norse host of 8,000 under the leadership of Ubbe Egilsson – grandson of Ubbe Ragnarrson, first Jarl of Bamburgh – had occupied. While the Anglo-Saxons were gathering their strength, a Northman by the name of Kolbjörn had taken to raiding the Welsh countryside, and had even passed through Offa’s Dyke to ransack Mercia at some point between 927 and 932.​

__3RP5KHsoFl6RCaQhNvsil4avNkEL70edVCOUXN8Vxwm22x0nP5m5ySLq4mJgsPVsiqnIxj-dSJjNzsR4DRNn783eBF_2jwGSuogeFs8IV6sljdNFusnoZwkjq9zmiMey36mI3JWTKSpV2tIVoNeek9YzN6pnM80kL1xcu30Mh_NSMHHLqQl6g3y3xwkQ

Ubbe had been narrowly defeated by Ælfmær with an army half the size of the Norse host in March of 928, however, Kolbjörn would only be dealt with by a coalition of Welsh and Anglo-Saxon armies at Small Heath in 932, with Beornwulf, Eormenred and Cydrych of Gwynedd defeating the Northmen in a remarkable event of solidarity between the Welsh and English.

Chester had once more become the primary target of the Anglo-Saxons, and in August of 932, the borough was once more besieged by Beornwulf. While the garrison of Danes had managed to construct additional fortifications during the Anglo-Saxons’ short period of woes, little prevented the East Angles from capturing the city in the Winter of 933. By this time, Sigriðr had already fled the city for Dublin, leaving any Heathens inside the city to be at the mercy of the infamously ruthless Beornwulf.​

us31DE8D0ECplMsglU43gsXpMzt2Gdh-3LChF3_ykLcw4YUBD4kyzQAqgfNCz6HncwqwAgZnY9koOjTKnJT6EdhO4LWcq_UuWWi0MBQePOyeC-ci9LWe6ggtaBPrvrU9Fi2iCjO6X4QeF_6IPoBay-p8_TSMBYyKC7N362wPD7TwrD3eQ7mQx5UZT1cPog

England, c. 934. Northumbria is Beornwulf’s primary in-game title for the remainder of his reign. He will still be referred to as an East Anglian Lord, same as his successor.

By 933, the West Saxons had managed to use Beornwulf as a tool to realise their ambitions. With the subjugation of the East Angles, and their conquest of both Mercia and Northumbria, there was little opposition in southern England for Eormenred to declare himself King of the English on the 16th of October, 933. While there was little resistance to the West Saxons’ southern supremacy, the existing Northumbrian aristocracy – which survived the kingdom’s conquest in 867 – struggled with the fact that a southern King ruled the north. In an attempt to reconcile with the Northumbrians, Eormenred appointed Beornwulf to govern the former kingdom. Among the West Saxon nobility, and attested to in various chronicles, there was an unwavering belief that the East Anglian sub-king had gathered immense popularity as a saviour of Christians in the north, and was an ideal choice to be a middle-man between southern and northern lords.

While Beornwulf was certainly popular among Northumbria’s nobility, the modern belief is that the sub-king northern adoration was wildly exaggerated.

Northumbrian Monk Leofric writes:

“[Eormenred’s decision], although purportedly an act of royal favour, was met with scepticism and apprehension by those in the North. Beornwulf's reputation as a ruler who rewards blind loyalty, while mercilessly crushing any hint of dissent precedes him.”​

GGDqigAr3t0rO9Mqqiwy7AUHAirHXCxkTz9cU8gAhOo2lEJAsYiy3x_Nw99VLAi6ZlMSFyeG_iiKzXud1VDRknYLz0JiCTFsyaEs97O1_lulfGKEd2yObHXY4r7_TcmorvdDMgVt2ELi9WsBJuLqSknc_BYwUVtlt2_gQnTUI_XxeDpuFg9qwcDMlqeaHg

Despite the history between the Anglo-Saxons and Welsh, Eormenred had more success in subjugating these Western Britons than the more culturally similar Northumbrians. Following the Battle of Small Heath, Eormenred and Cydrych of Gwynedd had formed a budding relationship, one which the Anglo-Saxon King had exploited to formally procure fealty from the pre-eminent Welsh kingdom in 932. At Hereford, Eormenred had set the boundaries of the Welsh kingdoms at the Rivers Wye and Dee, with present-day Shropshire granted to the Mercian Ealdormanry during this meeting, alongside a hefty annual tribute. Shropshire, however, would be ruled by the Ealdorman of Mercia – which at this time was Beornwulf – only in name, and was only de facto under the administration of the Anglo-Saxons decades later.

The following half-decade of Beornwulf’s life consisted of mercilessly crushing any dissent within the former Northumbrian Kingdom, and breaking any semblance of organisation the Norse and Britons had in the Scottish lowlands, abruptly passing away in 937 to unknown causes at the age of 59. His first daughter, Wulfgyth, had died of unknown causes in 929. Of his other three daughters of his second marriage, two had been promised to the clergy, and the third had died of an unknown disease in 933. In November of 936 – 6 months before his death – scarce evidence was presented where Beornwulf had discovered a plot to assassinate him by his own granddaughter, Wynnflæd, daughter of Wulfgyth. It is unknown whether Wynfflæd had carried out her plans, or for what purpose.

Regardless of the outcome, Wynnflæd was the sole inheritor to any personal properties Beornwulf had left behind, and in late-937, his granddaughter had also been appointed Lady of all three of the late Ealdorman’s responsibilities – being Mercia, Northumbria, and East Anglia.​

BRiiS7m3JVPgLosGy5jJRnX192LJH63zQfmmpEq6Y5vx9saf-opFjTWk8d0-23hY2VvNW4xDKDKvk4xRn7rlFpn1Tw3OHIwbuUHY13vP-NALXh3-Gcp_x1E6Lqq4_U9IE5dz0Ozc4LY5IzUUE5PCEsNurQoLl6wmboxNABD8qJ46T9P1YGFGFu_WtJJa9g


Map of Europe 942.png

Europe in 942, 5 Years after Beornwulf's Passing
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
A lot happened during the last decade of Beornwulf's rule. I tried to fit in as much as I could while trying to make it still flow, but there's a few things which I'd missed out, with Beornwulf's Bishop, Stawell, fighting and winning against Alfgar in a bar fight during my House Feud with the House of Mercia being a pretty funny one I could've included. But alas, I wasn't sure where it'd slot in after all I'd written.

What do you think about Beornwulf's life? I know you haven't met his granddaughter, Wynnflaed, but do you think she'll live up to her ancestors' legacy?

Stay tuned! :)

For those who are not aware, @Koweth was named Best Character Writer of the Week for this AAR. Well done! :cool:
Indeed! It's an award which I hadn't expected to see my name on, ever (I wasn't sure that Historybook-style AARs would be given such an award, considering the writing on each character isn't nearly as deep as some of the narrative ones), but I am, regardless, very grateful that I've been bestowed with Best Character Writer of the Week. Fitting, I suppose, seeing as Beornwulf's life has finally come to an end after 4 chapters.
 
Last edited:
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Northumbria is Beornwulf’s primary in-game title for the remainder of his reig

This makes a lot of sense, as Northumbria is the most prestigious title out of his collection. Northumberland was the original overlord of the heptarchy before mercia, and Beornwulf controls the furthest extent of their influence personally.

It also makes sense for him to be the most powerful Lord, given he not only has to guard the Scottish border but also the north Sea coast, and control the northern lands themsevles (always a hard task).

Had he a solid male heir, their rise to dominant England would have been complete. As it is, there's going to be a series of fights to see who will control and inherit his vast realm, both by underlings, his family and his ostensible overlord.

Should one man control all of it again though, he'd be best placed to be the power behind the throne or King himself, unless the current royal family consolidates their grip on the south.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Good to see this update. Sad to see the "Hammer of the Danes" pass however.

By 924, the Danelaw was crumbling under the weight of Anglo-Saxon reconquest.
The inevitable ending....
I know you haven't met his granddaughter, Wynnflaed, but do you think she'll live up to her ancestors' legacy?
Had he a solid male heir, their rise to dominant England would have been complete. As it is, there's going to be a series of fights to see who will control and inherit his vast realm, both by underlings, his family and his ostensible overlord.

Should one man control all of it again though, he'd be best placed to be the power behind the throne or King himself, unless the current royal family consolidates their grip on the south.
It seems Wynnflaed has an early tendency toward espionage. I do think more debate on her influence regarding whether she truly had a hand in her grandfather's death might have played that up more to let us get a better glimpse of her. She will need all of those skills in intrigue to weather what is ahead.

As TBC ( @TheButterflyComposer ) rightfully points out, she will need to deal with the male dominated politics of the time and they will likely be coming to pick Northumbria apart unless she proves her mettle.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
As TBC ( @TheButterflyComposer ) rightfully points out, she will need to deal with the male dominated politics of the time and they will likely be coming to pick Northumbria apart unless she proves her mettle.

Well, she's Anglo saxon and so is everyone else. So economically speaking and concerning inheritance, she has equal legal status with men. Indeed, she'll be the default family matriarch if everyone else is dead..

What she needs is several sons to fight wars for her, as well as the loyalty of her housecarls. Her only real disadvantage is that she can't fight as easily as her male rivals.

But she can definitely hold her realm together and even be ambitious about expansion if she wants. Long term though, her main goal is having as many children as possible and making them as competent as possible.
 
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
Well, the Danelaw is defeated. Congrats!

How easy would it be for Beornwulf's descendants to usurp the throne of England? They control more land than the English kings do.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions: