I made some suggestions in how to cut the wastelands so that it looks more clean
Last edited:
- 14
- 2
- 2
- 2
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I made some suggestions in how to cut the wastelands so that it looks more clean
Already mentioned it int he other thread but the rassids are still missing from the map. They should be split of from Yemen.
- 4
- 1
.png){kind=avatar}
I would disagree. Pitch black, for me, looks like a strange void.
Current old previous 
The brighter colors of both wastelands and ocean tiles is producing unnecessary noise imo. It's a bit dizzying.
Also, the color of the sea tiles is bleeding through the market colors a lot more now, making it more difficult to see the transition on similar colored sea tiles.
I prefer the dark background without white lines, as shown in the Germany feedback map.
The new version with sea and land at least gives more depth to those colorings
perhaps it is just the light brown colour people dont like
- 8
- 4
- 3
Corridors still look not great with coloured wastelands. It seems it should be easier for them to become your colour. I see plenty that are uncoloured for no good reason.
- 3
- 1
What happened with dates? Did they get cut and merged with fruits?
It's a shame then.
I really liked how it brought flavor to arid/desertic regions. Maybe it's just me, but It feels weird to see the Arabian península full of fruit, like you would expect to see in a tropical region.
It's a shame then.
I really liked how it brought flavor to arid/desertic regions. Maybe it's just me, but It feels weird to see the Arabian península full of fruit, like you would expect to see in a tropical region.
Last edited:
- 5
I have the exact opposite opinion
I'm not literally becoming dizzy of course, but I do find it harder to read.As the map mode uses color to convey information, the blues and browns are simply interfering with that, as those parts need to "shut up".
The wastelands will usually be situated on the fringes of the market map mode, where the colors wil be darker and desaturated already anyway.
How about a dark/neutral gray (#424242) for wastelands, and slightly brighter tones for the actual market access maps?
Idk, sth like this: (very crude illustration of what I mean).
In any case, the locations/wastelands that don't participate in the map mode should be a neutral, noninvasive color imo.
| 
|
- 9
- 3
- 2
- 1
Yam color is too similar to that of Yemen, Otaibah's colour is too similar to Subay's. So their colour should Imo be changed.
- 3
So you removed dates, and I see some beeswax but no saffron... basically no reason to bother with raw materials anymore: it will be WIP until the last DLC
- 2
I'm serious. Split sea zones make the debate between Arabian and Persian Gulfs void.
- 1
- 1
Yes, we have this issue because they are generated from the locations; so they add a dynamic 'al' prefix because of coming from that location, which is added to the scripted localization 'Al' on those locations that start with it. We're looking towards solving this behavior.
- 27
- 2
- 1
Johan will talk about the additions and rework of the raw goods this Wednesday.
- 33
- 28
- 3
SPOILERJohan will talk about the additions and rework of the raw goods this Wednesday.
- 4
Interesting to see that Dhofar is ruled by the Rasulids yet it's not a vassal of Yemen, is it in a PU perhaps?
That would be very dumb. People should just grow up and accept that geographical features can have more than one name, and sometimes one is more often used than the other. Or, if people cannot be bothered to accept either one of the names, just make up a third one like "Bay of Mesopotamia" or something and call it a day.
Splitting it to stupidly small sea areas which would have negative in-game effects would be a dumb solution
- 6
- 5
- 2