-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I've had four instances of Paraguay picking fights with the United States, the Soviet Union, or Japan. Each time it's been quite disruptive.
At this point, 1940, though, everyone's at war so it doesn't matter too much.
At this point, 1940, though, everyone's at war so it doesn't matter too much.
Wolfhead said:
Hi,
Thanks for running the both tests. I was meaning to do this myself when I got a chance. From this we are indeed a bit slower, but still completely playable.
mm
Black_Shade said:
Hi,
Yes, this would be unsat if it was "normal" performance. Your machine is a lot better than mine so obviously something is messed up. Right now I'd suggest doing a completely clean install of both patched DD and CORE2 and see if this fixes it. I'll also check and see if any of the team has any further ideas. Sorry for the painful slowness.
mm
Wespe, is it just a graphics issue or are those units really available? The graphics is still on the to-do list (I'm actually working on them as we speak), so as we shifted the model numbers around could confuse matters.Wespe said:
You have overall a better PC than I have, with the same graphics card, so that won't be the issue here. I know we experienced unacceptable slowdowns up till the fourth beta, but those have been resolved (though I'm still at a loss what was causing that).Black_Shade said:
The "a.i. going crazy and dow'ing everyone" issue occured in my very first Core 0.25 game. Already in February 1936...
Within three weeks half of the world was at war with each other (started by Haiti dow'ing Egypt) and the game crashed.
It seems to happen more often than assumed, considering how many people had that problem already.
Within three weeks half of the world was at war with each other (started by Haiti dow'ing Egypt) and the game crashed.
It seems to happen more often than assumed, considering how many people had that problem already.
Not me. It's running fast and smooth and nothing crazy going on (like Haiti dow'ing anyone). I'm sure that the CORE team is doing everything they can to help anyone who is having problems with the new release -- but they should also be made aware that not everyone is having problems with 0.25.
CB
CB
It happened in my very first beta game as well (the 2nd of January 1936 even). But I've run quite a few since and it has not reoccurred. In all only three similar reports were made during the beta period, all quite early on. It is/was a known issue, and apparently is occurring more often than assumed. It will definately be looked after, that's for sure. We're starting to get an idea at least what might be causing this - the current hunch is higher interventionism values for the minors compared to Vanilla.seattle said:
It cannot be only minors though.
In my first game Japan DOW'ed Switzerland (!) in Oct. 1937 while it was busy in China. Yunnan responded with DOW'ing Egypt....
In my first game Japan DOW'ed Switzerland (!) in Oct. 1937 while it was busy in China. Yunnan responded with DOW'ing Egypt....
First I want to say to all CORE members : You did a good job 
Of course not everything is superb (an it never will be - many peoples like diffrent things).
I found very confusing menaging fleets. There are many types of every ship class. I`m not sure if it`s really neccresary, post-jutlan ships are useless (their low cost is not changing this).
Numbers of ship class are also very confusing. I will show it on example: let`s take germans subs, model 3 (type VII) is better than model 4 (type IIC).
Of course not everything is superb (an it never will be - many peoples like diffrent things).
I found very confusing menaging fleets. There are many types of every ship class. I`m not sure if it`s really neccresary, post-jutlan ships are useless (their low cost is not changing this).
Numbers of ship class are also very confusing. I will show it on example: let`s take germans subs, model 3 (type VII) is better than model 4 (type IIC).
Great 0.25
Thanks for the fantastic V. 025 !
Playing Core for DD is really fun and the new events, techtrees and techteams really rock for Germany. (past Munich).
Funny: why is Austrias "1. Gebirgsjäger" at 100% Experiance with only a strengt of 5/10% ?
My game experience is that the game runs at about 50% of DD 1.2 or Core 0.22. I am using the fastest setting.
Thanks for the fantastic V. 025 !
Playing Core for DD is really fun and the new events, techtrees and techteams really rock for Germany. (past Munich).
Funny: why is Austrias "1. Gebirgsjäger" at 100% Experiance with only a strengt of 5/10% ?
dec152000 said:
My game experience is that the game runs at about 50% of DD 1.2 or Core 0.22. I am using the fastest setting.
Hagar,
Thanks for answering. I hope you understand that I do sincerely appreciate all the work the folks have done/are doing on this mod. I was just a bit disappointed with all the downloading, and re downloading.
The Nuclear ships are available. It's not just the graphics.
I also noticed that I have HS-123 available as well in the aircraft section.
Thanks for answering. I hope you understand that I do sincerely appreciate all the work the folks have done/are doing on this mod. I was just a bit disappointed with all the downloading, and re downloading.
The Nuclear ships are available. It's not just the graphics.
I also noticed that I have HS-123 available as well in the aircraft section.
HFL said:
Hi,
With the unit arriving at low strength it will lose experience as it is reinforced. So by setting the starting experience at 100 it should end up with 10 once it is at full strength. Kind of a hack but it gets the desired result.
mm
Wespe said:
Hi,
To me it looks like your install is somehow crossed up as CORE2 doesn't even have 1951 Infantry units. So at least part of CORE2 is missing or not being properly activated. I've never seen this problem develop before but I've asked over on CORE if anyone has a suggested solution.
mm
is anyone else showing "-2147483648 escorts" in the convoy management screen for countries that have convoys? or is this just me?
Hi,
That was already reported and I've mentioned it over on the CORE2 site. No idea yet where that came from.
mm
That was already reported and I've mentioned it over on the CORE2 site. No idea yet where that came from.
mm
Not quite, that depends on the mission really. So it's a cost versus performance issue. The model 3 is long-range, the model 4 short-range, in your example. So if you primarily want to go hunting in coastal waters why bother building the more expensive type VII's? Whatever the case in CORE: a higher number isn't necessarily better. It's more a question of specialization.Cerber said:First I want to say to all CORE members : You did a good job
Of course not everything is superb (an it never will be - many peoples like diffrent things).
I found very confusing menaging fleets. There are many types of every ship class. I`m not sure if it`s really neccresary, post-jutlan ships are useless (their low cost is not changing this).
Numbers of ship class are also very confusing. I will show it on example: let`s take germans subs, model 3 (type VII) is better than model 4 (type IIC).
Somehow most of the CORE nations happen to dislike Equador and Switzerland - they're rather often involved in this weird DOW runaways. Maybe a dislike of Cuckoo Clocks?Trinitrotoluen said:
HFL said:
When I started my UK game, I didn't notice any serious slowdown. But by May '36 the jumpy mouse and jerky map movement became really annoying. Having the game be slower isn't so bad, but the interface problems really make it difficult to enjoy playing.
I have no idea how to fix it, but I agree that something must be done about it. I'd rather play a smoothly-functioning vanilla DD. (I wonder what would happen if I just put the CORE events into the DD events folder? Could I then play regular DD with all the good CORE events and none of the herky-jerky interface problems?)