Wrong math for points overall.
One 1v1 game as 16th vs 4th and so much emotions.
No. It's the amount per tick if you add A phase, B phase and C phase points per tick. Of course C phase comes later but it gives an idea of what you can or canno't do per tick in each phase according to units prices. 4rd Armored is definitely ahead in B considering the deck has cheap solutions (hellcats, rifles, maraudeurs to give a few knowing for examples units like maraudeurs/M4105 cost 130, the perfect amount of the tick).
4rd Armored has 80/130/130 = 340.
3rd Armored (70/105/150) = 325.
2DB (100/110/115) = 325.
GA (80/125/130) = 335
1st Pancerna (90/115/125) = 330.
12thSS (70/115/135) = 320.
Lehr (75/95/150) = 320.
The ones which would benefit from more points in A (1st Pancerna, GA, 2DB) have no powerful hellcats whatsoever in their decks in A phase, the M10's from 2DB are the only ones which look alike but are more costly and have less speed. 1st Pancerna has cheap 15 points strelzcy for 90 points in A which explain their strong A phase but then got 150 points shermans in B then 190 and 210 points fireflys. GA is also a deck which doesn't get 76mm until B phase.
And obviously the german armored decks have more costly units and fewer of them on the field.
My point is you may have one hellcat per tick starting B phase with 4AD, but 2DB has to wait 2 ticks to get a 75/76mm 1200m gun. Same thing with GA, Pancerna or 3rd Armored. Not to speak about the number of ticks you need to get panthers on the field (2-3 ticks or more in B depending on what you get). And these hellcats do go way more quickly to the front than all the other units of the game.
It gives you a huge advantage.