Well... we're not sure how much damage we're doing to the relationship by ignoring their suggestions that we leave.
We can't see their numbers, only our own.
- 3
- 1
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Well... we're not sure how much damage we're doing to the relationship by ignoring their suggestions that we leave.
We can't see their numbers, only our own.
The game doesn't generate names for most chars?
How can we repair it without knowing how their tech works? or is it solely repairing what we can using their maintenance parts?
The game doesn't generate enough officers for a Navy with hundreds of Fighters.
We would need two or three times more Naval Academies.
We repair stuff without knowing how the alien tech works, by banging on it with a hammer.
- 3
Another five-day build-cycle tick.
Another polite suggestion from the Bork. Their patience is impressive.
We have now researched all the techs required to build both our jump-capable SRAM Fighters and also our jump-capable Launch Platforms. Including the ordnance.
Production will start immediately.
Another polite suggestion from the Bork. Their patience is impressive.
We have now researched all the techs required to build both our jump-capable SRAM Fighters and also our jump-capable Launch Platforms. Including the ordnance.
Production will start immediately.
- 4
Hmmmm...
It is now December 24th in-game.
According to this, it takes exactly a month to build a squadron of eight Partystarters. Thirty days exactly.
So we can build three squadrons (enough to precisely fill a Mountain-class Tender) in three months, and a total of 96 of them (requiring four Tenders) in a year.
Let's do it.
It is now December 24th in-game.
According to this, it takes exactly a month to build a squadron of eight Partystarters. Thirty days exactly.
So we can build three squadrons (enough to precisely fill a Mountain-class Tender) in three months, and a total of 96 of them (requiring four Tenders) in a year.
Let's do it.
- 2
- 1
The suggestions themselves do damage to our numbers, too. Or should, at any rate. I'm hopeful that the two balance out. But we can't be sure because we can't see their numbers.
Take away our mining facilities in ZNZ. Or give those to them.
And make sure they recognize our claim to AZ Microscopii before they put mines in there, too.
- 1
- 1
Precursors in Struve turn out to not be friendly. Threadmark? After this we leave them alone for litera in-game decades, mind.
- 1
After the first few, they stop being interesting or fun though, as they turn into “Jerx appeared, local Sabre squadron racked up some kills.”
- 2
- 1
Agreed. This one is still in the exciting phase though.
- 1
- 1
Same exact page as the encounter with the goons. Since these are precursors and apart from running away nothing much happens it's not really all that exciting as a threadmark.
On the other hand, this is the kind of post we spend searching for later when we returned to the system to clean it out. We may have cleaned it out already though -- In fact, I think we did.
- 1
- 1
We have a diplomat there, that's about it?
But it seems the diplomat manages to roughly compensate for the bad feelings over having politely asked us to leave. So if the descent is slow enough, the best appeasement is the one we are working towards - fill the system with banks as claims.
- 1
We could check the Diplomat's diplomacy skill modifier. We should have the highest skill diplomat we have working on that.
But I doubt that's not already the case.
- 1
Third encounter with the Jerx. Against a pretty well defended system. Our first test of the TRP forces, starting off with a missile strike that doesn't do enough to actually kill anything.
- 1