A long and bloody patth has been taken. Death calls for revenge, and only God knows where it leads to.
- 1
As is traditional, they prefer to watchnor that of Stanley.
"We march to war under the banner of the mightiest of Pork Pies, no man can stand against such pastry"Send for the Mowbray herald
Quite. And actually, the Yorkists have done pretty well for themselves throughout even if they don't feel that way. By my count, York is winning 6-1 (if we consider Duke Humphrey the the first domino to fall.) Lancaster has now lost the 1st Duke of Somerset, the Duke of Suffolk, Cardinal/Archbishop Kempe and now the 2nd Duke of Somerset, plus the Earl of Northumberland and Lord Clifford. I don't count Cardinal Beaufort because he died of natural causes. Truthfully, the Battle of St. Albans could have seen even more death but Buckingham, the young Earl of Dorset (Somerset's son) and the King himself survived.The original instigator may be dead, and thus technically this is a victory, but this is merely the start of a civil war. It will not end till the monarchy is strong and whole again, and all the families surrounding it repay their debts in blood or otherwise are dead.
Indeed. I had to include that last part in the post because while some of the bad actors died, they have heirs who will want blood. The most interesting to me going forward is the Earl of Dorset/now 3rd Duke of Somerset. His path is/will be something to watch.A long and bloody patth has been taken. Death calls for revenge, and only God knows where it leads to.
Very true. It has been one of the more difficult things to grapple with as I move into the next chapter. Not to spoil too much, but Margaret takes on a larger role.Somerset is dead but the war has only just begun.
Henry remains king, but he knows that his authority is growing nominal - and that the Queen and York will attack each other over this deed.
Haha!As is traditional, they prefer to watch
Zing! I had to include that detail because that was what the office was called and connects him to Norfolk."We march to war under the banner of the mightiest of Pork Pies, no man can stand against such pastry"
Thank you. I'm pleased they came off so well. I've been itching to write the battle for years by this date. And as I've said before, I do not feel terribly comfortable writing battles. It's just not my strong suit. More on the battle below.A pair of excellent updates, the battle of St Albans seems bloodier than I expected, though that could just be the difference between a vivid narrative update and the cold words of a wiki article.
Haha! Indeed, if we go by historical data that is true. However things will continue to diverge ever so subtly going forward so I promise nothing.In any event the Indeterminate Rose-based Conflict has begun! Expect the next battle in about 5 years or so, which is a majestic rate of progress even I am impressed by.
Nah, she's not so stupid. She wouldn't do anything that would harm her son.She hasn't the talent or allies to win. But she could potentially destroy it all by revealing the parentage I suppose.
But that wouldn't necessarily destroy England as much as it would put the yorkists on the throne and then go after France in revenge. And this is EUIV. France won't survive such an attack.
Margaret is furious. I wonder if that will make her more irrational?
Eleanor is Somerset's wife, right? I wonder if she might change her mind about any support for the queen once she discovers the truth of their... dealings.
What happens if the Prince does die? Does that resolve the problem? Margaret would be outraged, but the only thing that she could do then is have an actual child with Henry... like she was supposed to.
Also, she's calling York the Devil - she is aware that this entire war is her own fault, and she's guilty of adultery. She's guilty of at least lust, pride, and greed of the deadly sins. That comment strikes me as a tad hypocritical... Is she in denial of her own flaws? How does she justify this to herself?
Especially since France is barely breathing at the moment in game. It's been a while since I've given a real update there, but let's just say that not much has gotten better for them since last we checked in.She hasn't the talent or allies to win. But she could potentially destroy it all by revealing the parentage I suppose.
But that wouldn't necessarily destroy England as much as it would put the yorkists on the throne and then go after France in revenge. And this is EUIV. France won't survive such an attack.
Indeed she will.There's nothing as dangerous as an injured beast. Maggie is going to prove it...
Agreed. The Prince is her entire power base at this point. Without him, she is entirely useless.Nah, she's not so stupid. She wouldn't do anything that would harm her son.
Likely yes to the first part. And yes, Eleanor was Somerset's wife. How much she truly knows about the affair I'll leave a secret for now, but there has been plenty offered to suggest she may suspect. However, being a lady in waiting is a pretty powerful position giving the Lady an in at court and all that entails. However however...given the way Margaret reacted to Somerset's death and shrugged aside Eleanor's own grief cannot possibly be pleasing to her. So...we'll see.Margaret is furious. I wonder if that will make her more irrational?
Eleanor is Somerset's wife, right? I wonder if she might change her mind about any support for the queen once she discovers the truth of their... dealings.
Without the Prince, we'd be right back to where we were before with York clearly the next best alternative as heir. The most powerful Beaufort at this point will be the Earl of Dorset (soon to be the 3rd Duke of Somerset) Henry Beaufort who at the time of this last update is around 20 and pretty badly hurt himself after the battle.What happens if the Prince does die? Does that resolve the problem? Margaret would be outraged, but the only thing that she could do then is have an actual child with Henry... like she was supposed to.
Margaret is most definitely hypocritical, in denial of her own flaws and justifies it all by telling herself that she is superior to any other, perhaps including the King himself. The "poor pitiful me" act tends to grow very thin and weak after enough time and without proof.Also, she's calling York the Devil - she is aware that this entire war is her own fault, and she's guilty of adultery. She's guilty of at least lust, pride, and greed of the deadly sins. That comment strikes me as a tad hypocritical... Is she in denial of her own flaws? How does she justify this to herself?
I'm pleased that you translated for yourself the final lines she speaks in the update. As always, I hope my French speaking readers will let me know if I misuse the French. My five years in middle and high school only gave me a small amount of knowledge but I do try to use it correctly.She is quite the hateful creature, in various ways. May end with her head on a spike but boy, will it take the kingdom being burnt down to get there.
Though of course if she thought getting rid of the Prince would enhance her power I am certain she would chuck him off a tower in a heartbeat and never lose a wink of sleep over it.Agreed. The Prince is her entire power base at this point. Without him, she is entirely useless.
Though of course if she thought getting rid of the Prince would enhance her power I am certain she would chuck him off a tower in a heartbeat and never lose a wink of sleep over it.
Though of course if she thought getting rid of the Prince would enhance her power I am certain she would chuck him off a tower in a heartbeat and never lose a wink of sleep over it.
I make no bones about the fact that I do not care for Margaret. That said, I do try to portray as realistic. She does have ONE redeeming quality, but we won't see too much of it until later.I did not think you could make me dislike Margaret more, but then you pulled that scene out of the bag. Truly she is utterly without any redeeming feature isn't she?
I think her cruel and selfish treatment of Lady Eleanor is probably up there with the worst things she has done in this work, at least in terms of exposing the pitch black pit that passes for her soul. To dismiss the seconds old grief of a widow as being less important than an inconvenience to herself is, even by the standards of French royalty, staggeringly self centred. I would call it out as being implausibly so, yet it is also entirely in line with Margaret's awful character.
That would present a quandary, no doubt. For a great many people.She would have to if she happened to get actually impregnated by the king and birthed a male heir...
After so much dirty water under the bridge, it is indeed time! The long build up to it of course allows us as readers to feel some of the pent up tension finally released. And sides (roses) finally taken. Bravo, sir.York turned his mount around towards St. Albans and then spoke calmly, “Brother...it is time.”
The elder Richard Neville tipped his helm and rode off to command his troops. Within minutes, the sound of hooves and yells carried through the air and battle commenced. It had been a long time coming...many years, in truth...but armed resolution was finally at hand.
The road is long and winding, indeed. Not being familiar with either EU4 or whatever event chain it may have for England that may approximate the WOTR, does a battle at St Albans (or somewhere else) actually occur in game? Or are we primarily following a complex parallel story arc that weaves its way in between history and the game as played to take a third path of your own devising?In short, my young Lord...we are not yet finished. Far from it. We have now stepped to the path. The end of our journey is...uncertain.”
Could not stop self to reply, even though coz1 will answer this better, and it has been already answered, but anyway;Not being familiar with either EU4 or whatever event chain it may have for England that may approximate the WOTR, does a battle at St Albans (or somewhere else) actually occur in game? Or are we primarily following a complex parallel story arc that weaves its way in between history and the game as played to take a third path of your own devising?
No, there is no need, and there should be no need for an apology for the pace of publishing, nor for the speed of writing, high or low, and never for the length of a piece of a story. These are not just posts, but posts of the story. Comments may differ in regards for a regulation, but the posts of a story are free and only bound to the imagination of the writer.So first of all, I apologize for moving so quickly in posting
Meh. Whoever said it, ...whatever.Once again, I was counseled by some at the time not to write an AAR so closely aligned to real history
Hmmm, this one requires more in-depth reply, and that would truly break the beyond-limits of the acceptable length of the comment-posts, so will refrain from this one, but only highlight: No, there is no actual need to enjoy the story for telling it. But it is certainly more fulfilling when the reaction to the work is observed, concurring with that, yes.In order to write successfully (read: continuously, not profitably) the writer must enjoy the story they are telling. And part of the enjoyment is seeing the reaction by the reader.
Always good to have you back, sir, and no doubt it was a long time coming for these events to finally happen. I'm pleased that you use the word "tension" because it is palpable surely. I wanted it to feel that way so if it is there, yay me.Caught up again after my forced (sport, then illness) absence and, of course, our humble interlocutor has been very hard at work!
After so much dirty water under the bridge, it is indeed time! The long build up to it of course allows us as readers to feel some of the pent up tension finally released. And sides (roses) finally taken. Bravo, sir.
@filcat actually covers it below rather better than I might in terms of the game mechanics, but in short - no, there is no actual battle in game. I've played a bit forward after this date and do hope to mirror the game more as we move along, but this battle was important to cover if we're telling this story and so I had to include it. So to answer the question honestly, it is your final suggestion above. EUIV does not do any better than its predecessor to model the WOTR (by and large) and I did find that with a few playthroughs to start, I was just going to have to model it on my own. I was forced to change Henry's stats and take action in game that I would not normally do were I trying to win. Recall, I even modded the save file to give Normandy back to France when they refused to win the war for themselves (let's be kind to the French because somehow that hurt them even more???)The road is long and winding, indeed. Not being familiar with either EU4 or whatever event chain it may have for England that may approximate the WOTR, does a battle at St Albans (or somewhere else) actually occur in game? Or are we primarily following a complex parallel story arc that weaves its way in between history and the game as played to take a third path of your own devising?
For some reason, I now have Hall & Oats in my head after reading this comment. Margaret is not quite "Rich Girl" (especially because Rene her father wasn't so rich by this date) but nice girl she isn't. Blame Suffolk. It was all his idea. A local girl would never have done for a King of England (despite OTL in which Edward woos Elizabeth Woodville) but surely there was another, better candidate that may have been a more appropriate choice.Margaret? It’s all been said about the real villain of this work. Boo, hiss! She is determined to do her Nero thing. How May history have differed if Henry had married a nice local girl instead …
Never apologize for the length of your comments, sir. Short, long or anywhere in between are appreciated. And you do a fine job above looking at the mechanics of the game and how it models the WOTR. Not well indeed. If I truly wanted to base this story on a game, I'd have been better off using Kingmaker (a game I still have not played despite all of the good words said about it.)Was not going to, then some remarks of coz1 from yesterday caught the attention; then also the question of Bullfilter has come, and it seems interesting to pull out a couple of words for a comment.
- "a couple words", hah. This will be a long one, filcat, innit?
- Probably. Hit the music.
- All right. Phase Shade by Davidovix, pseudo-retro, 2022. Do not forget the preamble.
- Oh yeah, you are right.
[The author sincerely apologises for overreaching the size-limits for a regular comment post]
Could not stop self to reply, even though coz1 will answer this better, and it has been already answered, but anyway;
eu4 does not have that many detailed-events of the incidents for depicting the history, and it does not have any mechanics for storytelling in such volumes as seen here. The events in any case coincide with the end of a standard run of crusader-kings-span, and that game has more opportunities to capture such character-interactions more than eu4.
eu4 bulldozes over all by prompt-forcing a war by scripted-event, so it will happen no matter what, unless england-tag relinquishes the province maine to any other tag. The war is force-attempt on the code, which starts as a reunification war on france-tag by england-tag. In the game, the england-tag, when controlled by the code, has nought chance in that war. Ninety-five percent of all runs the code-england will be devastated. On rare occasions-runs, the spain-tag or the-hre-austria-tag interferes, or joins as an ally, against the france-tag; on few occasions-runs, the burgundy-tag calculates that there is weakness on either side, thus declares wars and wreaks havoc.
The england-tag has a ruler called henry; this bloke has 0 (nought) monarch skills; this is scripted as a simplification for another event to trigger: The War of the Roses.
But whatever it is or they are, all are resolved in a couple of years of run in the game.
First of all, thank you for remembering what I have said to all when I started and as I have played/written and secondly, and while I appreciate the compliment, I am unsure that I have mastered anything here. I'll finish one post and think, "That's the best thing I've ever written" and then finish another and say to myself, "Jesus, that's just shit!" I've never been very good at self editing and reworking or rewriting a thing once it's done. I would get a B or C on college papers at times instead of an A for that very reason. That said, you just have to push on through. It all comes out in the wash, right?On the other hand, coz1 took the extraordinary route, and has started with implementing some changes on the conditions of these game-specific events, to better reflect the actual flow of the time in history as much as known by the records. Thus, according to universal filcat-o-metre, it is getting to magnificent scale as a story for fiction with historical setting [*].
Judging by the amount of labour put on each word in every sentence of all paragraphs, and the superb structure, and the meticulous details, the story is head-on course to be the magnum opus of coz1, as it stands now (unless The Creek Will Rise returns - that one is whole another level).
[*] If there are concerns or questions or further remarks about or against the terminology with fiction, then much more can be written what it is and what stories are; but that would be better off the thread, and be taken probably to The SolAARium: Discuss the craft of writing for a discussion (anyone remember that one? No? Oh come on - go check, it is gloriously interesting).
- Finished?
- Nope. Not even close. By the way, enough of pseudo-retro. Send another one.
- Oh mate. Just make your comments bit shorter; will ya? All right. Lord Hypnos by In Flames, 1996.
I thank you but I will always apologize for moving too quickly. We all have real lives and thus other obligations outside of this forum. I know it all to well from my own experience. Post too much and/or too quickly, one will lose readers just because they cannot keep up. A lesson learned from 20 plus years at this forum. I desire as many readers and comments as possible, but I must weigh that by wanting to get my story out.No, there is no need, and there should be no need for an apology for the pace of publishing, nor for the speed of writing, high or low, and never for the length of a piece of a story. These are not just posts, but posts of the story. Comments may differ in regards for a regulation, but the posts of a story are free and only bound to the imagination of the writer.
First of all, who plays the bongo?Meh. Whoever said it, ...whatever.
Have to repeat again: No, that is the domain of the design of the writer's creation, from the imagination space in the mind to the pen onto the paper, to the brush onto the canvas, to the fingers onto the bongo (- bongo? - yeah, bongo. Got a problem with it? - Nope. Well at least it isn't banjo. - What'd you say? - Nothing, carry on. Sigh.), and no one but only the writer - the painter - the musician - the sculptor - the dancer - the chef - the architect - the engineer - the doctor of the story can decide on whatever shape, however long, whichever direction it will have, be, fly into.
So; do no worries. Write, write more, and all will be read.
Fair enough, I'll agree in this way...you don't have to like the characters or even the path of a story, but one must at the least enjoy the writing of those things. Enjoy the exploration and find...wait for it...the motivation for continuing.Hmmm, this one requires more in-depth reply, and that would truly break the beyond-limits of the acceptable length of the comment-posts, so will refrain from this one, but only highlight: No, there is no actual need to enjoy the story for telling it. But it is certainly more fulfilling when the reaction to the work is observed, concurring with that, yes.
Sir, I thank you for the comments and I wish you and all else a happy new year as well! I'm not going to include the music as you do, but look up anything by Badly Drawn Boy because that was what I am listening to as I do the fb-fb.Anyway; will not be available for a while, therefore: Wishing all a happy new year in advance, cheers!
Of course, not to forget for the excellent writing;
Kudos.
- Still not finished? Bro - it's reaching almost to the critical mass.
- No worries, cut out the remaining parts.
- Pheew, I thought you were going to write even more. Good call, you're learning.
- What about the exit-music?
- All right, let it end with a bang. A Man With A Plan by Korpiklaani, 2016.