Fb-fb:
Too many Margarets around...
Said so, this chapter has been a quite succesful way to go over one of the most delicate chapter of this (his)tory.
Congratz.
...and Henrys, Richards, Williams, etc, etc.
At the time itself, people were plenty disturbed by it, and other occasions where a marriage had obviously been consummated before the age of around 15. It was legal...but so heavily frowned upon that the nobility did it sparingly enough. There are a few high profile cases of such things, and they all demonstrate:
A) a surpisng amount of disgust from the nobility for the man involved regardless of rank (because it was, as today, seen as pedophilia).
B) practical reasons why it wasn't attempted for pragmatic political reasons. Children can conceive but giving birth ruins their bodies to an extent that it has a high risk of rendering them barren, which is quite a big deal for feudal nobility marriages.
C) enormous amounts of public disapproval from everyone, esepcially commoners, academics and the church.
The scene itself was...alright? Margaret was sympathetic, Edmund was suitably creepy, and everyone else was trying fairly hard to pretend this was a normal wedding, albeit avoiding the married couple afterwards.
All true things, though I would say that in this period especially public disapproval did not seem to stop many of the actors from doing awful things.
And I would say that as bad as the rape itself is (and that is what I see happened) the pedophilia is even worse. I don't care how important the coupling might be for the future.
My thoughts on the matter, not that they’re too terribly important, is that a War of the Roses TL trying to stay true to the historical narrative so far cannot ignore the second most-important… coupling… of the entire period (after the marriage of the product of this, the future Henry VII, and his wife Elizabeth, Edward (the current Earl of March and future IV)’s daughter, which effectively ended the war). Every English, Scottish, and eventually British sovereign since the War of the Roses has been the descendant of a child or grandchild of this… coupling.
And it’s not as though such a subject is beyond the pale of the official EU4 forum, given how common it is for rulers to come of age on their 15th birthday and immediately produce a child heir that presumably had been conceived 9 months prior.
And if we must discuss it, as indeed, we have to for the reasons given above, the most honest and sensitive way to do so is to not sugarcoat things or sweep it under the rug.
All the same though… ick.
I appreciate these thoughts and understanding why I thought I needed to include it. I'll say more below.
A veritable blizzard of chapters, sir! I couldn’t let the earlier ones go without a comment or two, so here goes.
Always that nagging feeling that the sun will go back behind the clouds and the rain fall all too soon.
Isabel is the truth to power voice here, clearly.
And well might she so assert.
Isabel is very nearly the Cassandra figure here. And the Greek Tragedy theme would be well suited to these times. I really enjoyed this chapter and how you used her as the ‘remember thou art mortal’ figure.
I did enjoy writing for Isabel because she does not really play prominently in this time so I could be rather free with her. She has the Plantagenet pride and the acerbic outlook of Cecily. Poor Richard does not stand a chance.
Agree.
That sounds like the main plot line of any TBC CK AAR!
True words spoken.
Hmm. Clearly a new and nasty creature introduced to the swamp. Dirty deeds will be done, without doubt.
Poor little poppet. Truly forced to Think of England. But Edmund is right.
On Tailboys especially, probably not done cheap.
The ending may have been a bit cliched, but that was the first thought that came to mind.
That was disturbing... but I figure that it's accurate enough.
I wonder if the attitude of all marriages being for politics will prove problematic - it's true to the time period, sure, but that time period also had things like constant cheating and disputed successions... Come to think of it, isn't that attitude what caused the Wars of the Roses both in OTL and here?
Sort of. Mistresses and intermarriage by the larger houses does lead to quite a lot of potential claimants. Shoot, one could say that Edward III having so many sons that lived long enough to produce gives us the large list of folks with some type of claim.
As I think on it, it only actually occurred once, in Lancaster with Elfwine the Dark Wizard King.
Ged of course is Irish and wasn't a psychopath or a hard ruler in Ireland, the Pendragons of Albion took multiple generations to take England and their whole thing was chivalry (at least, to an extent), Little Dux is entirely focused on Venice, and Life of Brian...does feature an entire culture of supremely pragmatic sociopaths, but they take over the entire world, not just England. And since everywhere else 'not Ireland' is a colony until it is full of nothing but Irish, I wouldn't say they 'sorted England out' in that way...
...? About the claim a child would have?
Eh...moreso that there's far, far too many claiments to the throne, and the main ruling line hasn't actually got a completely rock solid lineage claim above all the rest. England has essentially far too many plantagenet children around, enough so that the two main family lines have multiple other lesser lines associated with them, plus their own offspring to handle.
This won't even get resolved by the Tudors either (though they basically crush most of it by killing a lot of the survivors, putting limits on who can marry who, attempting to legitimise succession laws etx), and really doesn't truly get sorted until Parliament finally finally properly finally decides the issue themselves. And then after a few uprisings and rebellions, a civil war, another civil war, another rebellion, and another rebellion, and so on, until things finally calm down when Victoria reigns.
...
Until Edward VIII, but fortunately he never had kids and so resolving that particular mess didn't figure into succession too much.
England's monarchy is relatively stable in power, but the succession itself has been remarkably wobbly considering the age and consistency of the crown itself.
Indeed, it is amazing that we consider the British/English throne so stable today compared to what happened on the Continent, but historically the opposite was true. Right up until a few months before he was frog-marched to the guillotine, Louis XVI still had an indisputable cachet as the eldest male-line descendant of Huges Capet, while George III was a fourth-generation interloper who had seen a serious revolt try to restore the previous dynasty happen in his lifetime just 35 years prior.
This is actually going to crib a bit from my notes for that Edgar Aelthing project but it is fairly relevant so…
[note: this was written about six months ago when Queen Elizabeth II was still alive]
It is a feeling of strange familiarity to write a medieval story set in England, particularly one centered around the restoration of a royal family of great antiquity to the throne. The present United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is virtually unique among all the nations of the Western world in the extent which the underlying feudal structure of the state has remained intact. One does not need to be living in the seventieth year of the reign of The Queen (and that I am even able to write that and everyone on Earth knows whom I am talking about just underlines this point) to see this; any time that monarch walks through the palace of Westminster, adorned in crown imperial and robes of state, flanked by emblazoned heralds and hundreds of bishops and lords in ermine and scarlet, time feels as though it ceases to be. Other countries may still maintain monarchies, but generally they’re appendix to a modern republic in all but name. Only in England, and to a lesser extent Scotland and Wales, is the apparatus beneath still extant - the Garter and Lyon colleges continue their work, the hereditary aristocracy are still major landowners and influential members of the public school set; the City of London enjoys her ancient privileges; the duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall still send their revenues to the royal households; the Crown Estate continues to hold dominion over the tidal zones and a thousand other marginal places; the Church of England an integral part of the state, and so on. Some might call it charming, others cancerous, but to the fantasy writer, the alternate historian, and the medieval enthusiast, it’s catnip - the ultimate case study of what a feudal world might look like if it makes it to the modern age…
Except to the historian, this is mostly nonsense. England hasn’t been “feudal” since the end of the Wars of the Roses, and even before that the dynamic of crown, nobles, and commons was substantially different than Continental realms. The Crown Jewels are reproductions dating to 1662, after Cromwell destroyed the originals, and the coronations and state funerals and openings of parliament are all inventions of King Edward VII, who effectively is the spiritual predecessor of J.J. Abrams in the art of manufacturing nostalgia. But of course the crowning absurdity is that the crown and aristocracy of England are well… not really English. Most of the great hereditary families of the realm are of Norman French origin, installed in their class by William the Conqueror and the dynasty he founded. Said dynasty which managed to kill itself off, resulting in the throne going to a French house that also managed to commit mass suicide, which then passed to a Franco-Welsh house that went mad with power to the exclusion of having children, and from there to Scotland’s royal house, which managed the spectacular feat of being violently overthrown not once, but twice within a half-century, leading to a very complicated song and dance where a German dynasty got the throne and held it until all the men of it successfully managed to have children with everyone but their wives, at which point it passed to the German-origin house of her present majesty literally a generation before the birth of her majesty (and it should surprise no one at this point that she apparently has native-speaker level fluency in French and German) and so it goes from there - an entire history of chaos and violence and foreign entanglements and integrations. Of the 31 monarchs to sit on the throne of England/Great Britain between William the Conqueror and George III (not counting Henry the Young King, Edward V, Lady Jane Grey, Mary I’s husband Phillip II of Spain, the Cromwells, or Mary II and William III having distinct reigns), 23-25 (depending on how one counts) had a major internal revolt in their reign, 17 faced down a rebellion explicitly targeted at overthrowing them, six lost their thrones, and four (Edward II, Henry VI, Richard III, Charles I) lost their lives. The throne of England then was probably the most cursed chair for a pre-1789 monarch to sit in.
However, it had the advantage of slowly accumulating more and more power over the centuries till it was an absolute monarchy (and still is, technically). Its just following the Yes Minister program of concentrating all power with the PM and then sending the PM away. Parliament and whomever was running it has been leeching power slowly from the crown for a similarly long time...but then the process screeched to a halt with the German Georgians, who essentially needed regents for much of their reigns. At that point, the executive government got in the way of parliament, and it became the one leeching the power away from the crown whilst keeping it intact.
That, I suspect, is the entire reason why the monarchy stays. Because it gives whomever is currently in government absolute power provided they have a working majority in Parliament, and aren't technically 'in charge' and have someone to bow to.
I'm going to let these three posts sit together because they all look very well at the crown in general (both over time and even at this time.) And
@Historywhiz , if that is an example of the work you are doing, you definitely need to post it in full!
I don't want to spend too much time looking at what happened historically because that is not this, but it does help explain somewhat how we got here. So I thank you both for offering it up. For those not as familiar with the throne in England's history, this is a great lesson and a consideration.
To all - So a few more words on the scene and its implications. Firstly, while I cannot say one way or the other whether Margaret Beaufort will prove as important in this TL as she did in OTL, she will be a character and I have a definite idea as to the how and why she becomes the way she does. To me, this scene was necessary to show part of what formed her personality and motivations. One does not come out of a circumstance like that unchanged. It is definitely a harsh reality, but I do not shy away from that in my writing. Especially if it is or may be an inciting incident.
That said, it was not easy to write. As disgusting as it was to the reader, it was so too for me as the writer. And not just Edmund's actions, but also her mother's pushing her to do it (not outright, but the implication of it.) However, and as difficult as it was to get into that head space, I would not be a good writer (or at the least challenged as a writer) if I did not allow myself to go places that make me feel uncomfortable. It won't be the first time and it won't be the last. I hope.
On a larger point, thank you to all for giving reply. I assumed there would be disgust. If there was not, I'd be a little concerned.
As for writing, I have finished chapter 11 and have outlined all the way through chapter 14. I know I'm posting rather fast right now (and as always, I do apologize for those that do not have the time to keep up) because I do have so much in the can and I'd like to finish posting chapter 10 before the end of the year. I will try to slow down a bit after that for your sake as much as mine.
![Wink ;) ;)]()
But there is a lot of good stuff coming up and perhaps even more challenging material. It's those scenes I am most curious how they will be received. That is why I am so thankful for you the reader and your always excellent comments. It lets me know if I hit the mark or not. So again, thank you!
Look for the next scene tomorrow, probably late. I can promise it is not as icky and even brings back a character we've not seen in some time.
![Smile :) :)]()