Fb-fb:
@coz1 a delightful scene!
I like Henry so much more as a former king. That poor man, such a pleasant personality having been weighed down with all that responsibility.
He's always had a sense of humor and a certain degree of keen insight, but it's so much more available now, and followed up by that snarky wit!
Rensslaer
What I enjoy writing for Henry is that I am able to suggest both his intellect and his perhaps innocence. While he is not a fool, he certainly acts like it quite often. It is that grey area that I like to explore in him.
Pleasant personality? Perhaps, but only if he was a complete nonentity. Unfrorusntly, he's one of those infuriating people who stands for nothing, does very little, and what he does do, does poorly.
He's nice (ish) but this entire AAR is his fault, at the end of the day. If he were truly so noble, good and holy as he presents, he'd tell the truth, stand up for what he believes in and take action.
He's spent YEARS ignoring the Queen, his bustard offspring existing, the realm nearly falling apart, and even now will not do the decent thing and either die or give up.
Infuriating all the way to the end. Henry can be no thing else.
Henry does himself no favours by refusing to officially renounce the crown (I assume that's what the scroll was about), yet at the same time is fully aware that people like Dr. Morton would see him back on the throne. That ultimately makes him a liability if there was ever a groundswell of support leading to another potential civil war. I know Richard loves his cousin, but how long could he put up with that distraction?
I appreciate the shout out,
@coz1. One post in and another coming soon. Now I just need an audience or it will be a very short revival
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
.
I will admit that like RL, I am having Richard act as Edward IV did and keep Henry alive. And it makes even more sense given that Richard and Henry have a long and somewhat caring history. Plus, it allows these little moments. To be sure, the best course of action would be to see Henry suffer "an accident" but I do not think Richard could do that. Much like Queen Elizabeth I fretted at the idea of killing Mary Queen of Scots (as both cousin and anointed Queen), I believe it would tear at Richard's soul to do such a thing. However, as suggested below, he may need to have others do what he cannot and then claim his own innocence.
There are shades here of Charles I and his determination not to renounce his prerogatives after losing the Civil War and eventually facing trial for his life. He knew full well what the consequences were likely to be, but would not render to men what he believed had been granted him by God: the only one qualified to judge him. A judgement which that determination brought forward by a good many years! Different situation and people, but some similarities too. I wonder if the consequences for Henry will be as dire …
That is a great comparison! There are indeed many similarities. While we are not quite to the "divine right of Kings" era, these people took their oath to God quite seriously and did fret over their mortal peril. Most especially Henry. It may have taken Dr. Morton to remind him, but it was not a hard sell as can be seen. Henry may have been a weak King, but his commitment to God is resolute. A tricky situation.
Will Richard shout
Will no one rid me of this turbulent Henry?
Ah, we shall see..
Richard would probably do well to follow the previous Henry, but I'm not sure he could take that step with this one. Indeed, we shall see.
Henry was great in this scene.
That last line was poignant. Such is the folly of Kings - both kings, really, are fools...
Will Margaret get back in touch with Henry? If she does, that would be a problem.
I do wonder sometimes if my descriptions read as I see them in my mind (as I tend to write as I might see them on the screen), but I did so enjoy both the line and Henry tipping the scroll to the floor with a smile.
I must admit I was warming to Henry until the end, when I was reminded why he was such an arse. If being God's Anointed is so important to him why did he flatly refuse to actually rule while he was king, surely that was just as much a denial of the Lord? While I'm not familiar with the exact wording of medieval coronation oaths I suspect they required him to actually do things and not hide away in prayer all the time.
For all that I think he is safe from a 'tragic accident', if Richard must suffer plotters then Henry is the ideal rival claimant - ineffectual, cowardly, imprisoned and doesn't actually want the job. Hard to get many people to rally behind that, yet by his mere existence he divides any opposition and stops them all rallying behind someone competent.
It is indeed frustrating that while Henry takes his oath seriously, he is barely capable of actually fulfilling it. I mean, he willingly gave it up and yet now refuses to fully commit to such. Thus the eternal quandary that is Henry VI.
To all - My output of late has been quite sparse and for that I apologize. I suppose it may help others catch up (if they still are) but I have been unable to write much of anything these last months due to work and perhaps some block. To quote George Harrison, "all things must pass" and I assure you we will get back to a steady stream of updates but for now I need to put them out slowly. We are about halfway through the chapter and while I am leaving some things unsaid, you may be able to read between the lines. I could spell it out in detail within the narrative, but if I did so it would take forever to move the plot forward.
To be certain, thank you all for sticking with me during this transition period (both in life and the story) and most definitely continuing to offer your most astute comments! As I have with all of my work here, I could not do it without you.
And the next scene follows in just a moment...