Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

Werewolf CCXXXVIII - A New Year's Celebration

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
wjWTSko.jpg


giphy.webp


The Fox News Justice League

HUNT ME WOLVES

Kisses from the Padre​
 
johho888 said:
Trying to meta the GM... He only added one GM zombie making it 20 players which is easier to divide by 4 to get 25% baddies in one pack than by 3 to get 33% baddies in two packs. Two GM zombies would be easier to divide by 3. But perchance it's only me that takes my rules of thumb that seriously... ;)

But with the Zealot role I think it would be easier than normal to have two packs in a small game like this since we'd need to kill every baddie but the sorc if the packs are made up of Wolves/Zealots. At the same time there would still be something for the Priest to detect.
Click to expand...
I think most people follow your rules of thumb. Should be noted, though, that the roles list probably was made for a larger game. But I do agree that things like Zealots easily could be in. And I do think it probably is a one pack game due to the small size of it.

alynkio said:
Wagon's vote against Arky would be in character for Evil Wagon, and all he's done since is tunnel DeChat.
Click to expand...
This deadline has turned out to be quite poor for me.
And how is voting Arky like that what evil Wagon would do? If I was evil then I'd have voted Avernite to put him firmly in the lead and have Arky drop out and possibly Darman too. Or, if time, I'd have tried to bring up an outside candidate. Making a TIE with two wolves just isn't what I do as a baddie.

And I've mainly voted de chat again because he never really got any traction and that often can be suspicious.
 
If my math is right, there's a two-vote tie between Wagon and De Chat.
 
aedan777 said:
Hmm, surprised that Darman was Arkasas' packmate, Arkasas' vote on him didn't seem like a sellout or alibi. If the wolves of that pack are doing that in general, it could make the voting record potentially rather misleading.

On the number of packs, it could go either way I think. We're small enough that only one pack is possible, potentially even likely. Two packs in something this small would be too fragile. Still could happen, but I'm slightly disinclined to think so.

Knowing now that Darman's a wolf, I think Day 3's Capibara's voters are more suspicious. They helped lead a switch away from a wolf. Beartjah both started it and pressed on it afterwards. His post pressing it is especially notable because he did so while Darman was in the lead. This helped lead to pressure dissipating on Darman and eventually shifting to Capibara. Strikes me as a little suspicious.

Now some will point to Beartjah leading the charge against Arkasas day 2 as proof in his favor, but I disagree. First off, it was a very lazy and suspicious vote of arkasas'. It was going to come under scrutiny sooner or latter, best as a packmate to get at the front for credit. More importantly, he did it by voting a packmate of his. So if beartjah voted Arkasas and got him lynched, not only was he gaining credit for himself, he was also protecting another packmate. I find this quite plausible.

Vote Beartjah
Click to expand...
Haven't had much time.
Reading back over the cases then I could see this possibly having some credibility. It at least would be a smart move if you have two mates in the running.
And while I still suspect Chat, then it is a thin reasoning and I've gone after him for several days, so I want to try and bring somebody else to the front who hasnt' really had much pressure.

Vote Meh Bear
 
Yep, I'm one up.
 
Unofficial Votecount, (~5 minutes to deadline):

Wagonlitz - 3: Hax [261], alynkio [279], brovahkiin

De Chat - 2: Johho888 [260], beartjah [262]

beartjah - 2: aedan2.0 [264], wagonlitz

Aedan2.0 - 1: Chieron [267]

Brovahkiin - 1 Dedonus []278

Not-Voted - 2:, @De Chatillôn, @nepechri
 
Unvote Meh Bear
Vote Chat
 
Unvote Meh Bear
Vote Chat
 
Deadline
 
That was self preservation. Reason there were two was that my net bugged out and I just started spam clicking post to ensure they were on time.
 
Official Votecount, (deadline):

De Chat - 4: Johho888 [260], beartjah [262], Hax [Wagonlitz 261 -> 295], Wagonlitz [beartjah 288 ->296]

Wagonlitz - 2: alynkio [279], brovahkiin [282]

beartjah - 1: aedan2.0 [264]

Aedan2.0 - 1: Chieron [267]

brovahkiin - 1: Dedonus [278]

Not-Voted - 2: De Chatillôn, nepechri

Wagonlitz's unvote and vote in Post #297 is invalid, as he was not on beartjah at the time of the post.

This is nepechri's first missed vote, so they shall remain in, for now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back