• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #23 - 18th of October 2024 - China

Hello, and welcome to another week of Tinto’s fun Maps. This week it will be a huge one, as we will take a look at the entirety of China. It is a really big area, but it didn’t make sense to split it into multiple parts to present it separately, so we are showing it all at once. So, without further ado, let’s get started.

Countries
Countries.png
Colored impassables.png

Obviously the territory is dominated by Yuán, with Dali as its vassal. They appear big, strong, and scary, but they will have their own fair share of problems for sure. I will not go into detail into the countries that can be seen further south, as we will talk about Southeast Asia in a future Tinto Maps.

Societies of Pops
SoP.png

Quite a variety of peoples in Southwest China, as you will see later in the culture maps.

Dynasties
Dynasties.png

Here we finally have managed to catch the full name of the Borjigin dynasty in all its glory.

Locations
Locations.png

Locations zoom 1.png

Locations zoom 2.png

Locations zoom 3.png

Locations zoom 4.png

Locations zoom 5.png

Locations zoom 6.png

Locations zoom 7.png

Locations zoom 8.png

Locations zoom 9.png
Before you ask, there are around 1800 locations in China proper, not counting impassables and barring possible counting errors.

Provinces
Provinces.png

Provinces zoom 1.png
Provinces zoom 2.png
Provinces zoom 3.png
Provinces zoom 4.png
Provinces zoom 5.png

Areas
Areas.png


Terrain
Topography.png
Climate.png
Vegetation.png

You will notice here that there are few locations assigned as "farmlands", that's because when we did this part of the map there was yet not a clear criteria on how we would be defining the farmlands and their placement here hasn't been reviewed yet.

Development
Development.png

As mentioned before, the harsh changes of development at the end of China proper is probably too strong right now and it’s something that will have to be reviewed, especially at the Liáodōng area.

Natural Harbors
Natural Harbors.png


Cultures
Cultures.png

Cultures zoom 1.png

Cultures graph.png

There is a lot of cultural variation in China, not only among the sinitic peoples (which have been divided according to their linguistical and dialectal differences) but also having many other types of non-sinitic peoples. The resulting pie chart for the cultures of the country is a wonder to see indeed. And even if Yuán itself is Mongolian, there are actually very few Mongolian people in the country, as only the ruling class would belong to it. That is one other source of further trouble for Yuán.

Religions
Religions.png

Religions zoom.png
Considering religion, there is also a lot of variation in the South West, and one thing you will notice is the clear lack of “Animism”. We have finally eliminated Animism as a religion from the game and have divided it into many multiple ones. Besides this, and some Muslim presence in some areas, there are other small pockets of religions that do not get to appear in the map, like Manichaeism, Nestorianism, Judaism and Zoroastrianism. And the elephant in the room is the Mahayana, that we have already mentioned that we have plans on dividing it, but more on it at the end.

Raw Materials
Raw materials.png

Raw materials zoom 1.png

Raw materials zoom 2.png
Raw materials zoom 3.png
Raw materials zoom 4.png
A very resource rich region, which makes it understandable that China was able to basically be self-sufficient in terms of resources for long periods in history, and with many sources of highly appreciated resources like silk, tea, and even soybeans. Another interesting thing is the division on the preference of grain cultivation, with rice being more prominent in the south while the north tends to favor wheat and sturdy grains (millet, basically).

Markets
Markets.png


Population
Population.png

Population zoom 1.png
Population zoom 2.png
Population zoom 3.png
Population zoom 4.png
Population zoom 5.png
Population zoom 6.png
Population zoom 7.png
Population zoom 8.png
Yes, there’s a lot of population in China, and with that many people and that many resources it obviously has a lot of potential. We have been following population census of 1351 and 1393, which allows us to have the most accurate values we can have.

Now, before closing off, let me turn back once again to the subject of religion, as it has already been pointed out that having a single Mahayana religion covering both China and Tibet (and parts of India) may not be the best both for accuracy and gameplay reasons, and we basically agree with it so we are planning on reworking a bit but it hasn’t been done in time for this Tinto Maps. However, as we are aware that you are not able to provide proper feedback unless we present you something, let me now share with you what are our plans with it. Please keep in mind that I will NOT go into details about their mechanics, and only talk about their distribution.

First of all, Tibetan Buddhism will be split and turned into its own religion. Although it “technically” is part of the Mahayana branch, it is true that its practices have distinguished it from Chinese Buddhism enough to represent it as its own religion, starting from the fact that they do not follow the same canon. The Mahayana that was present in India was already an outlier from start, so it will be made into its own religion.

That leaves out that the current “Mahayana” remaining in game will be Chinese Buddhism, that is, those following the Chinese Buddhist canon, and it will be present in China, Korea, and Vietnam. The question remains on what to call the religion, and several things have to be considered for that:

  1. The religion will already include blended into it Confucianism and Daoism besides Buddhism, so all three religions are included. That means it can’t be named either Confucianism or Daoism, as they have been bundled in. Buddhism was taken as the base name because, from the three, it was considered as the one mostly oriented towards the “religious” (Confucianism being more focused on administration and Daoism on rituals), and the most similar to what an organized religion would be outside of China.
    1. As a subpoint on that, and I can’t go into details for it yet, but there will also be options inside it to favor Buddhism over Confucianism or the opposite, so that is already covered too.
  2. As mentioned, it will be present not only in China but also in Korea and Vietnam (and any other country that may convert too, like for example Japan), so naming it something that’s too intrinsic to Chinese identity would not be ideal. That would mean that a term like Sānjiào, although good, would feel a bit out of place when playing for example as Korea (we know that the concept spread there too, but it was more prominent inside China and regardless having the name be directly in Chinese would be the main issue when playing outside China)

So, for now, the current name we are considering for the religion is directly “Chinese Buddhism”, or even leaving it as “Mahayana”, understanding that the main current of Mahayana is the version following the Chinese canon anyway. But feel free to suggest any alternative naming if you feel that there may be a better option we haven’t thought of, as long as it takes into consideration the previous points. And of course, let us know your feedback on the proposed representation and distribution too.

And that’s it for today, after a bit longer closing than usual. Next week we’ll be back a bit further east, taking a look at Korea and Japan. Hope to see you there!
 
  • 200Like
  • 66Love
  • 9
  • 6
  • 4
Reactions:
"Formosan" is from Portuguese... But anyway it will be a better name than Yuanzhumin in Vic3.
 
  • 5Like
  • 1
Reactions:
As someone already mentioned it, what about naming that branch of Buddhism Zen Buddhism? It's known term, it basically describes school of Chinese Buddhism, and it's not too Chinese to make "an identity problem" for believers in Korea, Vietnam or Japan.
Using Zen Buddhism to represent Chinese/Korean/Vietnamese religion is like renaming Protestantism to Lutheranism if Protestants also simultaneously worshipped their local gods and the Roman mos maiorum.
 
  • 10Like
  • 6Haha
  • 4
Reactions:
Yeah im quite conflicted because the actual size of Macau is far too small for it to be stimulated in the game but otoh it has immense historical value and was also portrayed in EU4 (vastly inflated portrayed size compared to its actual size). How will you simulate this @Roger Corominas
We decided against it due to it being too small and having other mechanics that can represent the foreign presence without the need of a location. But as always, everything is open for review.
 
  • 68
  • 39Like
  • 33
  • 6
Reactions:
Is it ok if I talk about inaccuracies regarding the population of Dai Viet in this thread or should I wait until the proper Tinto Maps devoted to all of South East Asia? Because according to one current academic estimate, the population of the entirety of Dai Viet in this period can't have been any lower than 3 million (according to footnote in Victor Lieberman's "Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context", page 368). That one estimate might or might not be correct, but I can't see it be any less than 2 million in reality, and certainly not the 847k as shown in the population map!
victor lieberman book screenshot.png
`
 
  • 14Like
  • 2
  • 2
Reactions:
please translate or transliterate, the dev team has said that they will use only one of those
Basically, just leave it as 'The Three Religions'. It will be short enough in Chinese or Korean localization anyway.

I do not think Korea's state religion being one-third Taoism makes sense, though.
 
  • 4Like
  • 4
Reactions:
What exactly is the reason why you guys are folding native faiths into other faiths with mechanics (Shinto/Buddhism, Korean Shamanism/Buddhism) rather than making them distinct faiths and dividing the pops accordingly? I'm sure you have one, just asking!

Otherwise, why is there no Han culture? It's fairly common knowledge in East Asia that the Han Chinese identity has been relatively persistent for at least the last thousand years; Despite linguistic differences, people who speak Jinyu and people who speak Mandarin would both think of themselves as Han Chinese.

I've got no other complaints or questions, just curious as to these two things. And I'll just throw this in for what it's worth, I'd really love some information specifically on Steppe Nomads and whether or not the intensely complicated nature of their societies and social hierarchies will be represented as opposed to the "free range anarchic barbarians" trope.
It is mechanically not possible for pops and countries to have more than one religion, that is why we have to fold them together in those cases.
Considering the whole Han grouping, we have other ways of representing their affinities, and a split among the different cultures is also better in terms of gameplay.
 
  • 49Like
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
Hello, and welcome to another week of Tinto’s fun Maps. This week it will be a huge one, as we will take a look at the entirety of China. It is a really big area, but it didn’t make sense to split it into multiple parts to present it separately, so we are showing it all at once. So, without further ado, let’s get started.

Countries
View attachment 1201429View attachment 1201430
Obviously the territory is dominated by Yuán, with Dali as its vassal. They appear big, strong, and scary, but they will have their own fair share of problems for sure. I will not go into detail into the countries that can be seen further south, as we will talk about Southeast Asia in a future Tinto Maps.

Societies of Pops
View attachment 1201431
Quite a variety of peoples in Southwest China, as you will see later in the culture maps.

Dynasties
View attachment 1201433
Here we finally have managed to catch the full name of the Borjigin dynasty in all its glory.

Locations
View attachment 1201434
Before you ask, there are around 1800 locations in China proper, not counting impassables and barring possible counting errors.

Provinces
View attachment 1201445

Areas
View attachment 1201453

Terrain
View attachment 1201454View attachment 1201455View attachment 1201456
You will notice here that there are few locations assigned as "farmlands", that's because when we did this part of the map there was yet not a clear criteria on how we would be defining the farmlands and their placement here hasn't been reviewed yet.

Development
View attachment 1201457
As mentioned before, the harsh changes of development at the end of China proper is probably too strong right now and it’s something that will have to be reviewed, especially at the Liáodōng area.

Natural Harbors
View attachment 1201459

Cultures
View attachment 1201460

View attachment 1201462
There is a lot of cultural variation in China, not only among the sinitic peoples (which have been divided according to their linguistical and dialectal differences) but also having many other types of non-sinitic peoples. The resulting pie chart for the cultures of the country is a wonder to see indeed. And even if Yuán itself is Mongolian, there are actually very few Mongolian people in the country, as only the ruling class would belong to it. That is one other source of further trouble for Yuán.

Religions
View attachment 1201463
Considering religion, there is also a lot of variation in the South West, and one thing you will notice is the clear lack of “Animism”. We have finally eliminated Animism as a religion from the game and have divided it into many multiple ones. Besides this, and some Muslim presence in some areas, there are other small pockets of religions that do not get to appear in the map, like Manichaeism, Nestorianism, Judaism and Zoroastrianism. And the elephant in the room is the Mahayana, that we have already mentioned that we have plans on dividing it, but more on it at the end.

Raw Materials
View attachment 1201465
A very resource rich region, which makes it understandable that China was able to basically be self-sufficient in terms of resources for long periods in history, and with many sources of highly appreciated resources like silk, tea, and even soybeans. Another interesting thing is the division on the preference of grain cultivation, with rice being more prominent in the south while the north tends to favor wheat and sturdy grains (millet, basically).

Markets
View attachment 1201470

Population
View attachment 1201471
Yes, there’s a lot of population in China, and with that many people and that many resources it obviously has a lot of potential. We have been following population census of 1351 and 1393, which allows us to have the most accurate values we can have.

Now, before closing off, let me turn back once again to the subject of religion, as it has already been pointed out that having a single Mahayana religion covering both China and Tibet (and parts of India) may not be the best both for accuracy and gameplay reasons, and we basically agree with it so we are planning on reworking a bit but it hasn’t been done in time for this Tinto Maps. However, as we are aware that you are not able to provide proper feedback unless we present you something, let me now share with you what are our plans with it. Please keep in mind that I will NOT go into details about their mechanics, and only talk about their distribution.

First of all, Tibetan Buddhism will be split and turned into its own religion. Although it “technically” is part of the Mahayana branch, it is true that its practices have distinguished it from Chinese Buddhism enough to represent it as its own religion, starting from the fact that they do not follow the same canon. The Mahayana that was present in India was already an outlier from start, so it will be made into its own religion.

That leaves out that the current “Mahayana” remaining in game will be Chinese Buddhism, that is, those following the Chinese Buddhist canon, and it will be present in China, Korea, and Vietnam. The question remains on what to call the religion, and several things have to be considered for that:

  1. The religion will already include blended into it Confucianism and Daoism besides Buddhism, so all three religions are included. That means it can’t be named either Confucianism or Daoism, as they have been bundled in. Buddhism was taken as the base name because, from the three, it was considered as the one mostly oriented towards the “religious” (Confucianism being more focused on administration and Daoism on rituals), and the most similar to what an organized religion would be outside of China.
    1. As a subpoint on that, and I can’t go into details for it yet, but there will also be options inside it to favor Buddhism over Confucianism or the opposite, so that is already covered too.
  2. As mentioned, it will be present not only in China but also in Korea and Vietnam (and any other country that may convert too, like for example Japan), so naming it something that’s too intrinsic to Chinese identity would not be ideal. That would mean that a term like Sānjiào, although good, would feel a bit out of place when playing for example as Korea (we know that the concept spread there too, but it was more prominent inside China and regardless having the name be directly in Chinese would be the main issue when playing outside China)

So, for now, the current name we are considering for the religion is directly “Chinese Buddhism”, or even leaving it as “Mahayana”, understanding that the main current of Mahayana is the version following the Chinese canon anyway. But feel free to suggest any alternative naming if you feel that there may be a better option we haven’t thought of, as long as it takes into consideration the previous points. And of course, let us know your feedback on the proposed representation and distribution too.

And that’s it for today, after a bit longer closing than usual. Next week we’ll be back a bit further east, taking a look at Korea and Japan. Hope to see you there!
As far as cultures go, I think cultures should have some sort of "similarity" value to each other, determined by whether how many provinces of that culture are the same religion as other cultures, who rules the lands of that culture, etc. And cultures thus belong to the "culture group" with cultures they are most similar to. It would allow for cultures to shift over time. For example, if you convert an area to sunni, they may drift closer to their muslim rulers' culture.

This may not be the best place for it, but given the number of cultures in China I figure its relevant.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Regarding the areas I suggest you to divide them based on the administrative division of the dynasties of the time especially the Qing at least for China proper
Screenshot_20241018_162519_Chrome.jpg
 
  • 7Like
  • 1
Reactions:
I think so.The Paradox can never distinguish Mahayana,Confucianiam and other folk religion like ancestor worship in Ancient China.Every time Paradox make all of chinese be converted to Mahayana at first.That is completely unreasonable!!!!
As I said, the religion will cover all of them at the same time, we just need to find a suitable name for it.
 
  • 43Like
  • 2
Reactions:
Having the entirety of China as a single dominant religion takes away from the diverse nature of the time. As stated, Buddism, Confucianism, and Daoist religious/philosophy have been bundled into a very... vague package. Is there some sort of plan to make it more interesting? Oh, you decide to favour Daoism the most, and slowly, the religious make-up of China moulds into something else? As playing the central government, you would greatly influence 'religion' much like the Ming Dynasty did, turning Daoism away from Chinese paganism and more towards the legal and historical perspective of Confusionsm.

While I think this option for Chinese religion seems to be very boring to me personally as I love the idea of having to balance the three big religions in China, perhaps by a government mechanic of some sort. This could lead to consequences, bonuses, or events, perhaps later.

Besides my rambling, I would love to see the religious makeup of China overhalled to be far more granular and Chinese. It is hard to have such a massive united religious umbrella over the entirety of China. Seeing how each religion may change and adapt with time can play an interesting role depending on if each religion is given its mechanics to contrast each other, making dynastic gameplay in China far more unique and replayable.

Imagine playing a Daoist-centric or Buddist-centric China, which leads to differing paths and maybe some reformation mechanics.

I hope those reading see the general idea of what I am thinking! :) I tried to word it as civil and helpful as possible, depending on my reading based on post-ming and late Yuan sources, as it has interested me. And I would hate to see the complexity and diverse nature of these three religious/philosophical pillars of Chinese identity condensed into a single religious idea or path.

But as always, lots of Love to the Tinto team for working hard to make europ- I mean Project Ceaser! ;)
 
  • 17Like
Reactions:
Hello, and welcome to another week of Tinto’s fun Maps. This week it will be a huge one, as we will take a look at the entirety of China. It is a really big area, but it didn’t make sense to split it into multiple parts to present it separately, so we are showing it all at once. So, without further ado, let’s get started.

Countries
View attachment 1201429View attachment 1201430
Obviously the territory is dominated by Yuán, with Dali as its vassal. They appear big, strong, and scary, but they will have their own fair share of problems for sure. I will not go into detail into the countries that can be seen further south, as we will talk about Southeast Asia in a future Tinto Maps.

Societies of Pops
View attachment 1201431
Quite a variety of peoples in Southwest China, as you will see later in the culture maps.

Dynasties
View attachment 1201433
Here we finally have managed to catch the full name of the Borjigin dynasty in all its glory.

Locations
View attachment 1201434
Before you ask, there are around 1800 locations in China proper, not counting impassables and barring possible counting errors.

Provinces
View attachment 1201445

Areas
View attachment 1201453

Terrain
View attachment 1201454View attachment 1201455View attachment 1201456
You will notice here that there are few locations assigned as "farmlands", that's because when we did this part of the map there was yet not a clear criteria on how we would be defining the farmlands and their placement here hasn't been reviewed yet.

Development
View attachment 1201457
As mentioned before, the harsh changes of development at the end of China proper is probably too strong right now and it’s something that will have to be reviewed, especially at the Liáodōng area.

Natural Harbors
View attachment 1201459

Cultures
View attachment 1201460

View attachment 1201462
There is a lot of cultural variation in China, not only among the sinitic peoples (which have been divided according to their linguistical and dialectal differences) but also having many other types of non-sinitic peoples. The resulting pie chart for the cultures of the country is a wonder to see indeed. And even if Yuán itself is Mongolian, there are actually very few Mongolian people in the country, as only the ruling class would belong to it. That is one other source of further trouble for Yuán.

Religions
View attachment 1201463
Considering religion, there is also a lot of variation in the South West, and one thing you will notice is the clear lack of “Animism”. We have finally eliminated Animism as a religion from the game and have divided it into many multiple ones. Besides this, and some Muslim presence in some areas, there are other small pockets of religions that do not get to appear in the map, like Manichaeism, Nestorianism, Judaism and Zoroastrianism. And the elephant in the room is the Mahayana, that we have already mentioned that we have plans on dividing it, but more on it at the end.

Raw Materials
View attachment 1201465
A very resource rich region, which makes it understandable that China was able to basically be self-sufficient in terms of resources for long periods in history, and with many sources of highly appreciated resources like silk, tea, and even soybeans. Another interesting thing is the division on the preference of grain cultivation, with rice being more prominent in the south while the north tends to favor wheat and sturdy grains (millet, basically).

Markets
View attachment 1201470

Population
View attachment 1201471
Yes, there’s a lot of population in China, and with that many people and that many resources it obviously has a lot of potential. We have been following population census of 1351 and 1393, which allows us to have the most accurate values we can have.

Now, before closing off, let me turn back once again to the subject of religion, as it has already been pointed out that having a single Mahayana religion covering both China and Tibet (and parts of India) may not be the best both for accuracy and gameplay reasons, and we basically agree with it so we are planning on reworking a bit but it hasn’t been done in time for this Tinto Maps. However, as we are aware that you are not able to provide proper feedback unless we present you something, let me now share with you what are our plans with it. Please keep in mind that I will NOT go into details about their mechanics, and only talk about their distribution.

First of all, Tibetan Buddhism will be split and turned into its own religion. Although it “technically” is part of the Mahayana branch, it is true that its practices have distinguished it from Chinese Buddhism enough to represent it as its own religion, starting from the fact that they do not follow the same canon. The Mahayana that was present in India was already an outlier from start, so it will be made into its own religion.

That leaves out that the current “Mahayana” remaining in game will be Chinese Buddhism, that is, those following the Chinese Buddhist canon, and it will be present in China, Korea, and Vietnam. The question remains on what to call the religion, and several things have to be considered for that:

  1. The religion will already include blended into it Confucianism and Daoism besides Buddhism, so all three religions are included. That means it can’t be named either Confucianism or Daoism, as they have been bundled in. Buddhism was taken as the base name because, from the three, it was considered as the one mostly oriented towards the “religious” (Confucianism being more focused on administration and Daoism on rituals), and the most similar to what an organized religion would be outside of China.
    1. As a subpoint on that, and I can’t go into details for it yet, but there will also be options inside it to favor Buddhism over Confucianism or the opposite, so that is already covered too.
  2. As mentioned, it will be present not only in China but also in Korea and Vietnam (and any other country that may convert too, like for example Japan), so naming it something that’s too intrinsic to Chinese identity would not be ideal. That would mean that a term like Sānjiào, although good, would feel a bit out of place when playing for example as Korea (we know that the concept spread there too, but it was more prominent inside China and regardless having the name be directly in Chinese would be the main issue when playing outside China)

So, for now, the current name we are considering for the religion is directly “Chinese Buddhism”, or even leaving it as “Mahayana”, understanding that the main current of Mahayana is the version following the Chinese canon anyway. But feel free to suggest any alternative naming if you feel that there may be a better option we haven’t thought of, as long as it takes into consideration the previous points. And of course, let us know your feedback on the proposed representation and distribution too.

And that’s it for today, after a bit longer closing than usual. Next week we’ll be back a bit further east, taking a look at Korea and Japan. Hope to see you there!
1729261843126.png
1729261874798.png

I feel like not all majorly Yi locations are part of Yi People SoP. There is 1 Dai majority location and it switched the entire province to Dai SoP for some reason
 
  • 2Like
  • 2
Reactions:
How about the name "Eastern Buddhism"? I feel like that name is less China-centric than "Chinese Buddhism". I feel like it is situated to the East of other branches of Buddhism and would feel more inclusive towards other nations that at that point either have already adopted it, or would end up adopting it historically.
 
  • 4
  • 3Like
  • 2
Reactions:
How about simply naming it "Three teachings" in english? That way it should be fine for Korea and Vietnam as well

Alternatively "East asian syncrethism" sounds more apropriate than "Chinese buddism" if a bit orthopedic
We are studying all possible options, but we'd like to avoid something that is too verbose.
 
  • 33Like
  • 6
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
It is mechanically not possible for pops and countries to have more than one religion, that is why we have to fold them together in those cases.
Considering the whole Han grouping, we have other ways of representing their affinities, and a split among the different cultures is also better in terms of gameplay.
Could you, in theory, have "Buddhist" pops in china represent mainly just the die hards and actual monks and monastery lands, so they can be their own separate estate, while having the rest of china be some variety of Chinese Folk Religion(or whatever other name may be decided) that mentions and has flavor for Buddhism(and a generally high relation with Chan Buddhism, at least in China, if not necessarily with Vajrayana) but primarily represnts stuff like Confucianism, Daoism, and other local religion?

Maybe even maintain the current idea of choosing to favor one religion over the other, so if you have a CFR/Three Teachings etc. that favors(or at least doesn't persecute) buddhism it provides extra power to the Buddhist estate.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: