• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I converted in 202 CE and this is the output of the converter. I selected "no" on basing CK3 de jure off of imperator, yes to historical heresies, a custom mod output name, and default conversion date (blank). What is going on? I used Invictus, Simple Timeline Extender (Invictus), and Invictus Historical Imperator Pack. Europe & North Africa have the issues, Asia is mostly fine
 

Attachments

  • 20220522130419_1.jpg
    20220522130419_1.jpg
    251 KB · Views: 0
  • 20220522130131_1.jpg
    20220522130131_1.jpg
    386 KB · Views: 0
I converted in 202 CE and this is the output of the converter. I selected "no" on basing CK3 de jure off of imperator, yes to historical heresies, a custom mod output name, and default conversion date (blank). What is going on? I used Invictus, Simple Timeline Extender (Invictus), and Invictus Historical Imperator Pack. Europe & North Africa have the issues, Asia is mostly fine
Hi, I need the save and converter's log.txt to check.
 
Interesting.
I wasn't able to load the save in Imperator without crashing, but I checked the history of Gothonia in the save.

The save date is 955.5.31.

Last 3 rulers of Gothonia in the save:
Code:
ruler_term={
    character=110461   # Walao, birth_date=877.10.21,  death_date=954.10.9
    start_date=954.5.6
    government="tribal_chiefdom"
}
ruler_term={
    character=111312   # Arbogan, birth_date=888.6.3,    death_date=954.3.1
    start_date=954.10.9
    government="tribal_chiefdom"
}
ruler_term={
    character=115518   # Erpmund, birth_date=935.10.18, alive
    start_date=954.3.1
    government="despotic_monarchy"
}
(comments added by me)

Arbogan died in 954.3.1, but became a ruler in 954.10.9??? Did you edit the save manually or use console commands?
Can you show a screenshot of the in-game ruler history of Gothonia?
 
Interesting.
I wasn't able to load the save in Imperator without crashing, but I checked the history of Gothonia in the save.

The save date is 955.5.31.

Last 3 rulers of Gothonia in the save:
Code:
ruler_term={
    character=110461   # Walao, birth_date=877.10.21,  death_date=954.10.9
    start_date=954.5.6
    government="tribal_chiefdom"
}
ruler_term={
    character=111312   # Arbogan, birth_date=888.6.3,    death_date=954.3.1
    start_date=954.10.9
    government="tribal_chiefdom"
}
ruler_term={
    character=115518   # Erpmund, birth_date=935.10.18, alive
    start_date=954.3.1
    government="despotic_monarchy"
}
(comments added by me)

Arbogan died in 954.3.1, but became a ruler in 954.10.9??? Did you edit the save manually or use console commands?
Can you show a screenshot of the in-game ruler history of Gothonia?
I did some console stuff because I got really bored and just wanted to end the game so I could get to CK3. So I migrated Gothonia into Hispania, Francia into Gaul, Naharvalia into Africa, Langobardia into Cisalpine Gaul, and Freistadt into Italia.
 

Attachments

  • 20220523123951_1.jpg
    20220523123951_1.jpg
    236,9 KB · Views: 0
I did some console stuff because I got really bored and just wanted to end the game so I could get to CK3. So I migrated Gothonia into Hispania, Francia into Gaul, Naharvalia into Africa, Langobardia into Cisalpine Gaul, and Freistadt into Italia.
Yeah, the save's very broken. I've released a new version that should skip the erroneous ruler terms, but it won't fix all the problems with your title history.
 
This is what I wanted in order to view the possibilities for civilization evolution from one recent paradox interactive game to another paradox interactive game however it was sadly not so popular on the official Crusader Kings 3 and Paradox Interactive Discord Channels. When I had attempted bringing up the idea/concept.
 
There is some thoughts on reddit for possibly Paradox Interactive to do a game/or games set between Hearts of Iron 4 and Stellaris. And what that might possibly be like.

Although there seems to be mixed thoughts on it especially since there see that the following are basically the idea to the Paradox Interactive games https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/what-alternate-history-scenarios-actually-work.1168416/ and so the history won't exactly be what is commonly thought of as history book historical accurate.
 
There is some thoughts on reddit for possibly Paradox Interactive to do a game/or games set between Hearts of Iron 4 and Stellaris. And what that might possibly be like.

Although there seems to be mixed thoughts on it especially since there see that the following are basically the idea to the Paradox Interactive games https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/what-alternate-history-scenarios-actually-work.1168416/ and so the history won't exactly be what is commonly thought of as history book historical accurate.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Turtledove https://www.amazon.com/Collected-Em...ocphy=9017329&hvtargid=pla-571646686297&psc=1
 
 
I guess my point is that the paradox interactive games players that would prefer to have the paradox interactive games to be as historically accurate as possible would most likely additionally to have the paradox interactive games players who would prefer to play to be able to create alternate history timelines have their personal gameplay preferences perspectively ruined/hindered.