Warwick makes a move. Good, good.
Judging English nobles in Calais is a sneaky move. Still, allegiance to Margaret is shameful...
Judging English nobles in Calais is a sneaky move. Still, allegiance to Margaret is shameful...
That's the thing about Woodvilles. They change sides so quickly.With a bit of luck, the Woodvilles in general and Elizabeth in particular may take a deep dislike of Edward, Duke of March.
Good, good.
Oh, there will indeed be forks. In fact, I've just finished writing through one of the biggest to come. It'll be awhile before it's published, but something to look forward to.Getting back up to speed again after you went back to warp factor 5!
Nice to see the frisson of alt-history excitement here and a reminder that, despite adhering so far mainly to the historical arc, there is the promise of forks in the road ahead.
I could tell.
Ditto.
Clearly, yes, even if it’s sometimes a stern chase.
Looking forward to it. More to follow later.
I do rather like the side of Edward comfortable with "slumming it" as it were. IRL, he was a man known for many vices and so this side of him seems natural.I was going through picking out the great lines, but then realised I was going to end up quoting half the chapter. Edward should definitely be sent out undercover more often if this is the dialogue that results.
That said I think my absolute favourite line was;
Because it comes with such classic gangster polite understatement. It needed Edward to follow up "The Lord of Warwick hears you've been a very naughty boy Rivers, he is... disappointed in you.", but then I suppose this would be a very different sort of work if he did.
In any event, another excellent chapter and not just because of seeing the Woodville's humbled, though that is a sight to warm anybody's heart.![]()
Warwick will try and take any advantage that he can and it just proves what a powerful base Calais was at the time.Warwick makes a move. Good, good.
Judging English nobles in Calais is a sneaky move. Still, allegiance to Margaret is shameful...
I can see the logic of trying to be the power behind the throne as an actual coup is still a step too far, perhaps not morally but certainly in terms of provoking more enemies. Plenty of Lords want the Queen gone and a return to solid government, but would still recoil from overthrowing God's anointed. So from that perspective the King is ideal, he is weak, indecisive and generally pliable. He's happy to spend all day at prayer while others get on with actually ruling. If the Queen can use him as a puppet well so can they.It's just a shame that they don't yet realize they need to depose the King as well, as he is far too forgiving and nowhere near decisive.
I can see the logic of trying to be the power behind the throne as an actual coup is still a step too far, perhaps not morally but certainly in terms of provoking more enemies. Plenty of Lords want the Queen gone and a return to solid government, but would still recoil from overthrowing God's anointed. So from that perspective the King is ideal, he is weak, indecisive and generally pliable. He's happy to spend all day at prayer while others get on with actually ruling. If the Queen can use him as a puppet well so can they.
To riff on Kurtie's response, they don't want the trappings of power (the crown or the throne) they want to wield power and, at the moment, are happy to have Henry as the puppet up front while they have control behind the scenes. Long term that might change, but with a war on that's a problem for the future.
It may still take some time. And for Edward and Warwick, they have to be a bit careful not to let the cat out of the bag if they are thinking a much larger change.I wonder when they are to realize that to have the power, they need to be the power.
It is a tricky proposition. But as said several posts back, all of the leaders of the court party are pretty much dead (the Cardinal, Suffolk and Somerset the elder) so it's all on the Queen now.At least they know that the Queen needs to be deposed. It's just a shame that they don't yet realize they need to depose the King as well, as he is far too forgiving and nowhere near decisive.
As has been mentioned before (and will be mentioned again within the work), deposing a King is not as easy as it sounds. The oath means quite a lot to these men, especially at this time when the church is everything and as you say - like it or not Henry is God's anointed. Self interest certainly plays into any eventual action, but to get all the Lords like ducks in a row is never easy in the best of times. I'd also think a real choice would have to be on offer if they were to do it. As powerful and wealthy as he is, Richard just is not loved. Either because of jealousy or he's just generally unlikable, who can say. But when offered in the past as merely head of Council, he eventually gets knocked back down. See below to Kurt...I can see the logic of trying to be the power behind the throne as an actual coup is still a step too far, perhaps not morally but certainly in terms of provoking more enemies. Plenty of Lords want the Queen gone and a return to solid government, but would still recoil from overthrowing God's anointed. So from that perspective the King is ideal, he is weak, indecisive and generally pliable. He's happy to spend all day at prayer while others get on with actually ruling. If the Queen can use him as a puppet well so can they.
To riff on Kurtie's response, they don't want the trappings of power (the crown or the throne) they want to wield power and, at the moment, are happy to have Henry as the puppet up front while they have control behind the scenes. Long term that might change, but with a war on that's a problem for the future.
Very true. Of course, part of that thinking is what may get them to finally take it for themselves. What is suggested by the Earls is somewhat that but I would agree, may not be far enough. We shall see.They are wrong. How many times York was the Protector just to get kicked the bottom and forced to start all over again? Even if the got rid of god old Maggie, there is going to be someone to step into her shoes to oppose good old Dickon Plantagenet and his happy children and allies.
At this point, I don't think it had happened but twice - Edward II and Richard II (not counting the Saxon and Danish Kings prior.) And with the former, eventually it was his son that came out on top. At this point in 1460, just mentioning it is treason.That is typically what the English did when they had a weak or rubbish king. Unfortunately this time, the barons and nobles have the extra issue of a scheming spouse.
The only solution that's ever worked in regards to those have been overthrowing the king.
As you might have noticed, I meant that scene to stand alone in many ways. It of course is there to set the mood of the country at the time, but I liked just telling one man's little tale of the day even if it ended very badly for him. I was actually thinking very fondly of one of my favorite sections from @Director's History Park: Who Wants to be Napoleon? in which the entire post is built around one cannon's journey through history.Up to speed again! Poor old Judd - never really saw it coming, when he should. Ah well, not the first or last to pay the ultimate price - by a long shot. Warwick is now in his element!
Thank you again for diligently reading through what by now has grown rather large. I do appreciate it. And good to hear on the history. This particular period up through the Tudors has always been one of my favorite bits of history so I've read quite a lot about it over the years. Even there, I learn something new about it every time.Still working my way forward, Coz...
I have long thought myself to have a decent grasp on history, but your story shows me how little I know about this period of English and generally European history. To be fair, I've always declared my interest to start at about 1500, growing as we approach the 19th and 20th Centuries. You have a firm grasp, to be able to converse and write about it so. Learning much as we go.
More fine scenes on page 11, and I'm on to 12. Thank you!
Rensslaer
I will take that as a compliment.This is painful.
Indeed. Quite the reason I named the chapter as I did. Regardless of his own troubles at ruling, Henry is not now nor has he ever really been given good counsel. Many of the above Lords make some good points, but they cannot agree and Henry has trouble making decisions. More, they look to their own self interest as much as they do anything for the King (except maybe Buckingham.)If only the Council of the King were as good as fighting York as they are as quarreling among them...
Key look at the scene as I am starting to show others that might be willing to go against the Queen.It looks like there are some people who are lukewarm about supporting the Queen... That's good.
I am pleased that you noticed that aside. I did want to show that Richard is in Henry's thoughts and not entirely in a poor way. I think he is more hurt than upset. Like a friend that has deserted you and you don't really know why.King Henry is forgetting things. That's very bad, especially since it might give Margaret more authority. At least he realizes that alienating York was a bad idea - too late for it to matter, of course, but the thought is nice.
I must admit I initially assumed that it had never happened and it was just Margaret and her clique faking orders in the King's name, then bullying a confused man into thinking he had 'forgotten' something that had never happened.King Henry is forgetting things.
French absolutism stalking the English council chamber? Gadzooks!The Chancellor looked askew, “We speak on matters of state. Our Lord sitting next to us is the state. What else is to be practiced but his own worth?”
Nicely said, yer worship!“Save your words,” Archbishop Bourchier replied with disdain, “I know who it is that you serve, sir. It is not this King. Frankly, I wonder how you were ever made to serve God as I see no grace within you. And you may tell the Queen that I said so.”
I will admit that I was very much inspired by a scene from the film Nixon when Halderman (James Woods) is talking about what is on the tapes and Nixon (Anthony Hopkins) doesn't remember going over it and Halderman is certain because he himself had briefed the President. Bishop Booth uses the exact same line.I must admit I initially assumed that it had never happened and it was just Margaret and her clique faking orders in the King's name, then bullying a confused man into thinking he had 'forgotten' something that had never happened.
He's an interesting cat in that he did not take sides readily so I can use him as a bit of a wild card. Glad that is coming across. And he is fun to write for. I can promise, there is plenty more of him coming up.That aside I very much enjoyed Norfolk in that scene, amongst the toadies and tragic figures he at least is enjoying himself. I hope he somehow manages a slightly longer life than he did historically, if nothing else he does enliven proceedings.
Indeed it is.I agree, the King getting even more indecisive, vague and forgetful is bad. And it’s not like he’s starting from a high point either. Sounds like another pressure-driven episode coming on.
I'll admit that line is possibly anachronistic, but it does sound like something this Chancellor might say (at least to me.)French absolutism stalking the English council chamber? Gadzooks!![]()
Archbishop Bourchier has became another interesting character to write or. And he's been around a long time in the story. I admit that I did not yet realize who he would become when I was writing for him as the Bishop of Ely. He's more a man in Buckingham's camp but I think he is starting to see the same troubles that Richard has talked about for a log time. And he doesn't like Booth because he sees him as just an upjumped Bishop promoted by the Queen.Nicely said, yer worship!