-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Ahmad Rumaythat is the ruler of Mecca in 1337 and you put it as ruler of Hillah too, he and his brother were both fighting for the city but reconciled in March 1337 and then in June Ahmad was confirmed ruler of Mecca
Ahmad Rumaytha is not the ruler of Mecca.
This guy is: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumaythah_ibn_Abi_Numayy
Ahmad is the son of Humayda, brother of Rumaytha, the Sharif of Mecca. And Humayda died in 1320.
- 1
More importantly
You are the guy/one of the guys who made this map, have you noticed that Al'Ali and Al Fadl have less location in the review than your map?
Did you made a mistake there or did the devs forget?
- 2
Just for clarification to the devs, those superscript Cs represent the letter ain which is written ʿ in the ISO standard. It's pronounced as a voiced pharyngeal fricative (/ʕ/).
- 1
Also, assuming A. M. on the map is Al Murrah, they should not exist in 1337.
Can probably just give that territory over to the Jarwanids.
As for dynasties, you can probably make the dynasty of Al Zafir "Al Zafir", since you did the same for Al Fadl/etc.
Can probably just give that territory over to the Jarwanids.
As for dynasties, you can probably make the dynasty of Al Zafir "Al Zafir", since you did the same for Al Fadl/etc.
- 1
Devs aren't relying only on what we give 'em. They do their own research as well, so if they make changes it usually means that they found some source or another that contradicted whatever we suggested.
- 4
- 2
Yeah, but I wouldn't worry about it. Going through 40+ pages of constantly changing feedback is bound to cause a couple mistakes, and the devs have their own input. I've changed the map over ten times by now, and I doubt that has helped. The feedback threads are a good way to get those sorted out.
Thankfully the community map for Persia is in its final form now, unless someone posts something groundbreaking.
- 2
- 1
Aren't you going to ask them why though? What sources they used I mean, considering you probably spent a lot of time making it aren't you curious where they got the info that say otherwise?
- 1
I don't know much at all about the situation in Arabia, so you should consult @Ispil on that. I just draw/combined the maps to make it easier to see the whole picture.
But when the Persia feedback is out, I'll be doing my own little nitpicking.
- 2
Hillah ruling further south than what I suggested, I did find in other sources. As for Al A'idh, it's not unreasonable that they controlled more of what was nominally Al Fadl territory than what I suggested given that Al Fadl controlling that far south in my sources isn't well-dated and might've been more of a seasonal migration maximum extent.
New markets map mode colors look great, but it is jarring with the brown wastelands. Maybe make the wastelands a darker color so that they don't jump out as much.
- 1
I do understand why no locations were added, but Khasab probably should be due to its strategic importance and natural harbor suitability. Otherwise maybe Duqm would also be good to add to shrink the physical length the corridor takes up and provide another fish RGO to Oman.
- 7
- 1