We need a few bad ones tooOriginally posted by Captain Krunch
Those look very good. I like how you threw in a few bad apples like "Herjólfr illugi"![]()
Sounds great. So... that means Bjarni or Þorvaldr (the two first)?
I had an idea for the alternate line that goes like this. One of the early monarchs can also be a conquistador. And there can be an event, where he goes on an expedition of exploration into the wilderness. He is led by a few Abenaki native guides, which he doesn't realize are leading him into a trap.
A fierce battle then rages in the forest between the Skraelings and the Vinlanders. The Vinlanders eventually end up victorious, but not without suffering heavy casualties (including the young king). The young king fought heroically and so is remembered always through song. Meanwhile, his young widow assumes the throne. As she is in grief, she is enraged with the Skraelings and attempts to get her revenge. But there are those who want to oppose this and keep peaceful trade relations with the natives.
In game terms, this would mean the player would have the option of accepting the young queen and keep the old Eriksson dynasty alive, or they can choose to support those who advocate a republic rather than a Monarchy. This would be where the lines branch off..... I would suggest to keep things equal that the Eriksson dynasty monarchs have on average, higher military ratings. whereas the republic monarchs would have higher administration ratings on average. Going with the Erikssons would mean war with the natives, this would finally give an excuse to use the command that raises the aggressiveness of natives. To go with the Republic should mean that the natives aggressiveness is lowered, and of course other effects...
What do you think?
Makes an interesting story, eh?![]()
Should this give two complete different branches all the way or do we cut back to the old line after a few generations?